Filling the space between trams and place: Adapting the ‘Movement & Place’ framework to Melbourne's tram network

Abstract Melbourne's legacy tram network is being modernised including redesign of over 1700 tram stops to provide level access boarding to comply with Australia's Disability Discrimination Act. This presents a significant opportunity to reimagine how tram corridor streetscapes can function as places that build upon neighbourhood identity and sustain local economic activity. However, the literature on the connection between transport infrastructure and place quality is small and relatively new. This is particularly true for street-running light rail (also referred to as ‘tram’ or ‘streetcar’) infrastructure. Based on the ‘movement and place’ model, this research presents a new framework to define place types served by Melbourne trams, as well as the different tram link types relating to tram infrastructure used to get people to/from those destinations. It implements the framework to the network and explores variation in movement and place framework links including categorisation of links into four tram streetscape groups. Implications of the framework for policy and future research are discussed.

[1]  Graham Currie,et al.  Success and Challenges in Modernizing Streetcar Systems , 2007 .

[2]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  Creating More People-Friendly Urban Streets Through "Link and Place" Street Planning and Design , 2008 .

[3]  M. Augé Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity , 1995 .

[4]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban Public Transportation: Systems and Technology , 1981 .

[5]  H. Dittmar,et al.  The new transit town : best practices in transit-oriented development , 2004 .

[6]  P. Katz The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community , 1993 .

[7]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? , 2005 .

[8]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban Transit : Operations, Planning and Economics , 2005 .

[9]  J. Gehl Cities for People , 2010 .

[10]  P. Newman,et al.  The land use—transport connection: An overview , 1996 .

[11]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Place quality in innovation clusters: An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney , 2017 .

[12]  Barbara McCann,et al.  Complete Streets: We Can Get There from Here , 2008 .

[13]  Graham Currie,et al.  Safety impacts of platform tram stops on pedestrians in mixed traffic operation: A comparison group before-after crash study. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Wim Timmermans,et al.  The Importance of Creative Participatory Planning in the Public Place-Making Process , 2014 .

[15]  David A. King,et al.  Streetcar projects as spatial planning: A shift in transport planning in the United States , 2016 .

[16]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[17]  Donovan Finn,et al.  DIY urbanism: implications for cities , 2014 .

[18]  John Friedmann,et al.  Place and Place-Making in Cities: A Global Perspective , 2010 .