Building consensus about eHealth in Slovene primary health care: Delphi study

BackgroundSlovenia's national eHealth strategy aims to develop an efficient, flexible and modern health care informatics framework that would be comparable to the most successful EU countries. To achieve this goal, the gap between availability and usage of information and communication technology by primary care physicians needs to be reduced.As recent efforts show, consensus on information and communication technology purpose and usage in primary care needs to be established before any national information and communication technology solutions are developed.The aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate measures in implementation of Slovene national eHealth strategy and to suggest an appropriate model for success by using the three round Delphi study.MethodsAn e-mail based, three-round Delphi study was undertaken to achieve consensus from a selected sample of nationally recognized experts from the fields of primary health care and medical informatics. The aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate measures and key obstacles in implementation of eHealth in Slovene primary health care by using the Delphi study.ResultsHigh levels of consensus on the majority of suggested measures were achieved among all study participants, as well as between the subgroups of experts from primary health care and medical informatics. All aims of the three-round Delphi study on eHealth implementation in Slovenian primary health care were achieved.ConclusionsThe three round decision Delphi process has proven to be effective for developing outcomes, ranking key priorities in primary care eHealth development, and achieving consensus among the most influential experts in that field. This consensus is an important contribution to future national eHealth strategies in the field of primary health care.

[1]  Bryan R. Cole,et al.  Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  P. C. Tang,et al.  Research Paper: Use of Computer-based Records, Completeness of Documentation, and Appropriateness of Documented Clinical Decisions , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  W. Hersh.  Medical informatics: improving health care through information. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  Gregory J. Skulmoski,et al.  Journal of Information Technology Education the Delphi Method for Graduate Research , 2022 .

[6]  Joan K. Chocholik,et al.  Research Paper: The Determination of Relevant Goals and Criteria Used to Select an Automated Patient Care Information System: A Delphi Approach , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  C. Delpierre,et al.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  J T Kalberer,et al.  The NIH consensus-development program and the assessment of health-care technologies: the first two years. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Matthew B Weinger,et al.  Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[11]  E. Neugebauer,et al.  Consensus methods as tools to assess medical technologies , 1995, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  Shaun Treweek,et al.  The potential of electronic medical record systems to support quality improvement work and research in Norwegian general practice , 2003, BMC health services research.

[13]  I Moscovice,et al.  Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities. , 1977, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[14]  James W. Altschuld,et al.  Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide , 1995 .

[15]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas H. Short.  Applied Statistics With Microsoft Excel® , 2003, Technometrics.

[17]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[18]  Samuel DiGangi,et al.  Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, Parallel analysis, and TETRAD , 2007 .

[19]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  Wolf D. Rauch,et al.  The decision Delphi , 1979 .

[21]  C Hsu,et al.  THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MAKING SENSE OF CONSENSUS PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT , 2007 .

[22]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making Assessing the Level of Healthcare Information Technology Adoption in the United States: a Snapshot , 2005 .

[23]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Research Paper: Implementation of Physician Order Entry: User Satisfaction and Self-Reported usage Patterns , 1996, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  R. Johnsen,et al.  The quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessment , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  B. C. van Steenkiste,et al.  A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient record for asthma , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  M. Kolšek.  Implementing electronic medical record in family practice in Slovenia and other former Yugoslav Republics: barriers and requirements. , 2009, Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo.

[27]  John Dixon,et al.  An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[28]  F W Lee,et al.  Impact of an Electronic Medical Record System on Community-Based Primary Care Practices , 2000, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[29]  France Légaré,et al.  Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: A study protocol , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[30]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu,et al.  Operational Definitions of Attributes of Primary Health Care: Consensus Among Canadian Experts , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[32]  B. Middel.  The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review1) , 2008 .

[33]  D. Hunter,et al.  Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .

[34]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression? A cross sectional study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[36]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  J. Kersnik,et al.  Perspectives of family medicine in Central and Eastern Europe. , 2008, Family practice.

[38]  K. Schulman,et al.  Toward estimating the impact of changes in immigrants' insurance eligibility on hospital expenditures for uncompensated care , 2003, BMC health services research.

[39]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..