Using artificial neural networks to predict impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty

Abstract Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a major issue and an important post-surgical complication. Impingement and subsequent dislocation are influenced by the design (head size) and position (anteversion and abduction angles) of the acetabulum and different movements of the patient, with external extension and internal flexion the most critical movements. The aim of this study is to develop a computational tool based on a three-dimensional (3D) parametric finite element (FE) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) to assist clinicians in identifying the optimal prosthesis design and position of the acetabular cup to reduce the probability of impingement and dislocation. A 3D parametric model of a THA was used. The model parameters were the femoral head size and the acetabulum abduction and anteversion angles. Simulations run with this parametric model were used to train an ANN, which predicts the range of movement (ROM) before impingement and dislocation. This study recreates different configurations and obtains absolute errors lower than 5.5° between the ROM obtained from the FE simulations and the ANN predictions. The ROM is also predicted for patients who had already suffered dislocation after THA, and the computational predictions confirm the patient’s dislocations. Summarising, the combination of a 3D parametric FE model of a THA and an ANN is a useful computational tool to predict the ROM allowed for different designs of prosthesis heads.

[1]  L. Dorr,et al.  Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  H. Malchau,et al.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[3]  R. Hambli Apparent damage accumulation in cancellous bone using neural networks. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[4]  Jens H Kowal,et al.  The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J. Jenny,et al.  Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. , 2017, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[6]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  Calculation of impingement-free combined cup and stem alignments based on the patient-specific pelvic tilt. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Daniel Kluess,et al.  Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Effect of inclination and anteversion angles on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implants , 2018, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  T. Brown,et al.  Bone-on-bone versus hardware impingement in total hips: a biomechanical study. , 2012, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[10]  M. Pérez,et al.  Range of Movement for Impingement and Dislocation Avoidance in Total Hip Replacement Predicted by Finite Element Model , 2017, Journal of medical and biological engineering.

[11]  S. Banks,et al.  Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  Rainer Bader,et al.  Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement. , 2007, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[13]  Karen M Kruger,et al.  A novel formulation for scratch-based wear modelling in total hip arthroplasty , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[14]  N. Verdonschot,et al.  Subject-specific musculoskeletal loading of the tibia: Computational load estimation. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[15]  H. Migaud,et al.  What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips. , 2017, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[16]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Computational evaluation of different numerical tools for the prediction of proximal femur loads from bone morphology , 2014 .

[17]  P. Kouyoumdjian,et al.  Clinical evaluation of hip joint rotation range of motion in adults. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[18]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  Thomas D. Brown,et al.  (ii) Impingement in total hip replacement: mechanisms and consequences , 2008 .

[20]  Chien-Chung Lin,et al.  Using nonlinear finite element models to analyse stress distribution during subluxation and torque required for dislocation of newly developed total hip structure after prosthetic impingement , 2017, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[21]  B. Morrey,et al.  Dislocation after Long-Necked Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  T. Brown,et al.  Impingement in Total Hip Replacement: Mechanisms and Consequences. , 2008, Current orthopaedics.

[23]  R. Barrack,et al.  Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[24]  T D Brown,et al.  Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  Rainer Bader,et al.  Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement / Finite-Elemente-Berechnung der Schubspannungen im Implantat-Knochen-Interface einer acetabulären Press-Fit-Pfanne bei Impingement , 2007 .

[26]  G Zatti,et al.  The unstable total hip replacement , 2008, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[27]  John J Callaghan,et al.  The capsule's contribution to total hip construct stability – A finite element analysis , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Recurrent Instability after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Beware of Subtle Component Malpositioning , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  Javier Martinez,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques as a Helpful Tool Toward Determination of Plaque Vulnerability , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  M. Krismer,et al.  Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Neural networks and pattern recognition , 1994 .

[32]  Gabriele Maria Lozito,et al.  On Training Efficiency and Computational Costs of a Feed Forward Neural Network: A Review , 2015, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[33]  J. Lipman,et al.  Influence of Total Hip Design on Dislocation: A Computer Model and Clinical Analysis , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  Kevin Ong,et al.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  K. Cashman,et al.  Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[36]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Influence of patient-, design-, and surgery-related factors on rate of dislocation after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[39]  N. Suzuki,et al.  Detecting cause of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty by patient-specific four-dimensional motion analysis. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[40]  Shijun Gao,et al.  Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, International journal of surgery.

[41]  A. Terrier,et al.  Dual mobility cups provide biomechanical advantages in situations at risk for dislocation: a finite element analysis , 2017, International Orthopaedics.

[42]  T D Brown,et al.  A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[43]  John J Callaghan,et al.  The 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The ‘Landing Zone’ for Wear and Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Smaller Than We Thought: A Computational Analysis , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.