Semantic Matchmaking and Decision Support System for Dependable Supplier Selection in the Extended Enterprise Supply Chain

Increasingly firms are competing through the formation of extended enterprises. An extended enterprise consists of a set of firms within a value chain that collaborate to produce a finished product. The case of dependable supplier selection, in the context of the extended enterprise, is complex where the focal firm has to select the supplier(s) for a specific class of customers depending on the value of those customers to the focal firm and the extended enterprise. This process requires careful consideration of a set of selection criteria to be used in selecting the suppliers. In this article, a semantic intelligent agent-based architecture and decision support system are presented for selecting dependable suppliers in the context of extended enterprise. tional rents are possible when alliance partners combine, exchange, or invest in idiosyncratic assets, knowledge, and resources/capabilities... that lower transaction costs or permit the realization of rents through the synergistic combination of assets, knowledge, or capabilities” (p. 82). Extended enterprise comprise of collaborative partners typically coordinated by a focal firm to jointly create value for the customer in the marketplace that is difficult if not impossible to create by any one single participating business. Here, the firm, with efficient focused capabilities, as the unit of competition is replaced DOI: 10.4018/jdtis.2011010103 International Journal of Dependable and Trustworthy Information Systems, 2(1), 50-80, January-March 2011 51 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. by a dynamic, high-performance network with a focal enterprise that creates customer value by dynamically aligning the assets of collaborating partner organizations as shown in Figure 1. Firms achieve competitive advantage by creating value-networks of organizations that collaborate to create unique, hard-to-imitate customer value propositions (Frazelle, 2002). Increased competitive environment has brought supply chain management to the forefront, in the context of the extended enterprise, to help companies reduce costs, improve responsiveness, flexibility etc. Supply chain management is a mechanism to monitor and supervise the flow of information, knowledge, products and payments as they move along the supply chain (Ding, Benyoucef, & Xie, 2005). A typical manufacturing company spends a large part of its total costs on purchasing raw materials, subassemblies and components from external suppliers (Weber, Current, & Benton, 1991). In the textile and the semiconductor industries, as in many other industries, businesses are increasingly outsourcing the design and manufacturing of key elements of their products to a number of preferred suppliers (Ding et al., 2005). Competition is not between individual organizations but between competing supply chains, in the context of the extended enterprise (Cohen & Moon, 1990; Danneels, 2010). This shift to outsourcing to partner organizations in the extended enterprise enables the focal firm to focus on its core competencies and better allocation of its resources to the primary processes. Outsourcing manufacturing can contribute significantly to a company’s profitability and return on investment and contribute to the financial well-being of partner organizations in the extended enterprise. Buyer-supplier relationships based solely on price are no longer acceptable for suppliers of critical materials or for organizations (focal firms) that wish to practice the latest innovations in supply chain management. Recent emphasis has also been on other important strategic and operational factors such as quality, delivery, and flexibility (Ghodsypour & O’Brien, 1998). Potential benefits include lower product cost, faster product introductions, higher quality and lower asset investment. In addition, the focal firm can maintain control of manufacturing processes, contractually through choices of components, configuration and design (Ding et al., 2005; Fawcet, Stanley, & Smith, 1997) based on prudent supplier selection as part of the extended enterprise. The case of supplier selection, in the context of the extended enterprise, is complex where the focal firm has to select the supplier(s) for a specific class of customers depending upon the value of those customers to the focal firm and the extended enterprise. This process requires careful consideration of a set of selection criteria to be used in selecting the suppliers. Typically, Figure 1. Different types of matches 29 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the publisher's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/semantic-matchmaking-decisionsupport-system/53130

[1]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Concept Abduction and Contraction in Description Logics , 2003, Description Logics.

[2]  L. R. Lamberson,et al.  Quantitative Vendor Evaluation , 1976 .

[3]  Rahul Singh,et al.  Semantic information assurance for secure distributed knowledge management: a business process perspective , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  Piotr Cofta,et al.  Trust in Identification Systems: From Empirical Observations to Design Guidelines , 2010 .

[5]  Daniel R. Krause Supplier Development: Current Practices and Outcomes , 1997 .

[6]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  L. Ellram The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships , 1990 .

[8]  Ge Wang,et al.  Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology , 2004 .

[9]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Abductive Matchmaking using Description Logics , 2003, IJCAI.

[10]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments , 1999, SGMD.

[11]  R. Hill,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure , 1992 .

[12]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Vendor selection criteria and methods , 1991 .

[13]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  Linking SCOR planning practices to supply chain performance: An exploratory study , 2004 .

[14]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  A Semantics and Complete Algorithm for Subsumption in the CLASSIC Description Logic , 1993, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[15]  Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming , 1998 .

[16]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[17]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  An agent-based framework for building decision support systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Exploring an epidemic in an e-science environment , 2005, CACM.

[19]  Ali Chehab,et al.  Trust-Privacy Tradeoffs in Distributed Computing , 2010 .

[20]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an e-marketplace , 2004, ICEC '04.

[21]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change , 1996 .

[22]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  The RETSINA MAS Infrastructure , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[23]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Trust Modeling and Management in Digital Environments: From Social Concept to System Development , 2010 .

[24]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Semantic matchmaking in a P-2-P electronic marketplace , 2003, SAC '03.

[25]  Ian Turner,et al.  An Independent System for the Evaluation of Contract Tenders , 1988 .

[26]  J. Current,et al.  A MULTIOBJECTIVE APPROACH TO VENDOR SELECTION , 1993 .

[27]  Jean-Marc Seigneur,et al.  Collaborative Computer Security and Trust Management , 2009 .

[28]  Takahiro Kawamura,et al.  Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities , 2002, SEMWEB.

[29]  Tommaso Di Noia,et al.  A Nonmonotonic Approach to Semantic Matchmaking and Request Refinement in E-Marketplaces , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[30]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection , 2007 .

[31]  M. Braglia,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Principal Component Analysis , 2000 .

[32]  Alexandra Gerbasi,et al.  Trust and Technology in a Ubiquitous Modern Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives , 2010 .

[33]  Oren Golan,et al.  Impediments to and Affordances of Creating Trust over the Internet: The Case of Israeli Youth* , 2010 .

[34]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  A Uniform Tableaux-Based Approach to Concept Abduction and Contraction in ALN , 2004, Description Logics.

[35]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Larks: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[36]  Gülay Barbarosoğlu,et al.  An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Supplier Selection Problem , 1997 .

[37]  Stephen N. Chapman,et al.  Just-In-Time supplier inventory: an empirical implementation model , 1989 .

[38]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A Software Framework for Matchmaking Based on Semantic Web Technology , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[39]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  A System for Principled Matchmaking in an Electronic Marketplace , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[40]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[41]  Andrew C. Pan Allocation of Order Quantity among Suppliers , 1989 .

[42]  Jinlong Zhang,et al.  A supplier-selecting system using a neural network , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems (Cat. No.97TH8335).

[43]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN METRICS. , 2001 .

[44]  Robert E. Gregory,et al.  Source Selection: A Matrix Approach , 1986 .

[45]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance , 2004 .

[46]  Agostino Poggi,et al.  JADE: a FIPA2000 compliant agent development environment , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[47]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Decision Criteria Used in Buying Different Categories of Products , 1982 .

[48]  Nikos I. Karacapilidis,et al.  Building an agent-mediated electronic commerce system with decision analysis features , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Madeleine E. Pullman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS , 1998 .

[50]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Semantic-Based Resource Retrieval using Non-Standard Inference Services in Description Logics , 2005, SEBD.

[51]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Optimizing Aggregate Procurement Allocation Decisions , 1986 .

[52]  W. Johnston,et al.  Organizational buying behavior: Toward an integrative framework , 1996 .

[53]  Stephan Steglich,et al.  Observation-Based Trust Management for Services in Mobile Networks , 2010 .

[54]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Vendor Evaluation Using Cluster Analysis , 1969 .

[55]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  A knowledge-based system for person-to-person e-commerce , 2001 .

[56]  Hongwei Ding,et al.  A simulation optimization methodology for supplier selection problem , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[57]  Boualem Benatallah,et al.  A configurable matchmaking framework for electronic marketplaces , 2004, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[58]  S. Wheelwright Reflecting corporate strategy in manufacturing decisions , 1978 .

[59]  Neeraj Bharadwaj Investigating the decision criteria used in electronic components procurement , 2004 .

[60]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes , 1999 .

[61]  Alvin T. S. Chan Mobile cookies management on a smart card , 2005, CACM.

[62]  Erwin Danneels Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[63]  Christoph Bussler,et al.  Implementing agent coordination for workflow management systems using active database systems , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering: Active Databases Systems.

[64]  Alexander Borgida,et al.  Description Logics in Data Management , 1995, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[65]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[66]  Sheldon R. Smith,et al.  DEVELOPING A LOGISTICS CAPABILITY TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS , 1997 .

[67]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[68]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF VENDOR SELECTION SYSTEMS AND DECISIONS , 1966 .