Lay Public or Experts? e‐Participation in Authorization for GMO Products in the European Union

In the European Union, for the first time, lay people can participate directly in the procedure of assessment of GMO (genetically modified organisms) products, an exercise normally reserved for scientists and legal experts. What makes this a unique strategy of participation is that for each single application for authorization, lay people have the opportunity to express their views. This article presents the result of the first in-depth analysis of this type of Internet participatory exercise in the first years of its implementation. It shows that, despite generally participatory technology assessment aims at deliberative consensus on technical questions, this forum is instead a way to expose the work of regulative authorities to public scrutiny and to express dissent and opposition to the European Commission policy on GMOs.

[1]  M. Ferretti.  Why Public Participation in Risk Regulation? The Case of Authorizing GMO Products in the European Union , 2007 .

[2]  Robert D Carlitz,et al.  Online rulemaking: a step toward E-governance , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Susana Borrás,et al.  Legitimate governance of risk at the EU level? The case of genetically modified organisms , 2006 .

[4]  Simon Joss,et al.  Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policy- and decision-making in science and technology , 1999 .

[5]  L. Levidow,et al.  How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary , 1997 .

[6]  B. Wynne,et al.  Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs , 2001, Science as culture.

[7]  L. Levidow.  European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy? , 2007 .

[8]  Agnes Allansdottir,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends: final report on Eurobarometer 64.3 , 2006 .

[9]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  G. Séralini,et al.  New Analysis of a Rat Feeding Study with a Genetically Modified Maize Reveals Signs of Hepatorenal Toxicity , 2007, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[11]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? , 2003 .

[12]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Traditional and Modern Technology Assessment: Toward a Toolkit , 1998 .

[13]  W. Dean,et al.  Competing Conceptions of Risk , 1996 .

[14]  H. Nowotny.  Experten, Expertisen und imaginierte Laien , 2005 .

[15]  William Sheridan and Thomas B. Riley,et al.  Comparing e-government vs. e-governance , 2006 .

[16]  K. Shrader-Frechette.  Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1991 .

[17]  Janus Hansen.  Operationalising the public in participatory technology assessment: A framework for comparison applied to three cases , 2006 .

[18]  P. Bishop,et al.  E-Government to E-Democracy , 2005 .

[19]  L. Pellizzoni.  The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason. , 2001, The British journal of sociology.

[20]  B. Wynne,et al.  Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe (PABE) , 2001 .

[21]  H. Rothstein.  Precautionary bans or sacrificial lambs? Participative risk regulation and the reform of the UK food safety regime , 2004 .

[22]  R. Weber.  Basic content analysis, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[23]  Claire Marris,et al.  Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe: Report of the PABE project funded by the European Commission, DG Research (contract number: FAIR CT98-3844 (DG12 - SSMI) , 2001 .

[24]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[25]  Oliver Todt,et al.  Precaution in public: the social perception of the role of science and values in policy making , 2007 .

[26]  Gabriele Abels,et al.  Citizen Involvement in Public Policy-making: Does it Improve Democratic Legitimacy and Accountability? The Case of pTA , 2007 .