A Study of STEM Assessments in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics for Elementary and Middle School Students

The purpose of this study was to develop, scale, and validate assessments in engineering, science, and mathematics with grade appropriate items that were sensitive to the curriculum developed by teachers. The use of item response theory to assess item functioning was a focus of the study. The work is part of a larger project focused on increasing student learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related areas in grades 4–8 through an engineering design-based, integrated approach to STEM instruction and assessment. The fact that the assessments are available to school districts at no cost, and represent psychometrically sound instruments that are sensitive to STEM-oriented curriculum, offers schools an important tool for gauging students' understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics concepts.

[1]  T. Moore,et al.  Is Adding the E Enough? Investigating the Impact of K-12 Engineering Standards on the Implementation of STEM Integration , 2012 .

[2]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[3]  R. Bybee,et al.  The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[4]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[5]  Christine Y. O'Sullivan,et al.  TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frameworks. , 2005 .

[6]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[7]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[8]  John W. Wick.  Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. , 1980 .

[9]  John D. Bransford,et al.  How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom. , 2005 .

[10]  R. Brennan,et al.  Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking , 2004 .

[11]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[12]  G. Masters,et al.  Rating scale analysis , 1982 .

[13]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences , 1977 .

[14]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[15]  Dana L. Kelly,et al.  International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement , 1998 .

[16]  S. Urbina,et al.  Psychological testing, 7th ed. , 1997 .

[17]  Educational Evaluation.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[18]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[19]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[20]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Science of assessment , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.