Language Effects in Noise-Induced Word Misperceptions

Speech misperceptions provide a window into the processes underlying spoken language comprehension. One approach shown to catalyse robust misperceptions is to embed words in noise. However, the use of masking noise makes it difficult to measure the relative contributions of low-level auditory processing and higher-level factors which involve the deployment of linguistic experience. The current study addresses this confound by comparing noise-induced misperceptions in two languages, Spanish and English, which display marked phonological differences in properties such as consonant-vowel ratio, rhythm and syllable structure. An analysis of over 5000 word-level misperceptions generated using a common experimental framework in the two languages reveals some striking similarities: the proportion of confusions generated by three distinct types of masker are almost identical for the two languages, as are the proportions of phonemic and syllabic insertions, deletions and substitutions. The biggest difference is seen for babble noise, which tends to induce relatively complex confusions in English and simpler confusions in Spanish. We speculate that the inflectional morphology of Spanish lends itself to more easily recruit single elements from a babble masker into valid word hypotheses.

[1]  M. Vitevitch Naturalistic and Experimental Analyses of Word Frequency and Neighborhood Density Effects in Slips of the Ear , 2002, Language and speech.

[2]  A. Quilis Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas , 1993 .

[3]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[4]  Martin Cooke,et al.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Jon Barker,et al.  A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for English. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  T. Brand,et al.  Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Kevin Tang,et al.  Naturalistic speech misperception , 2015 .

[8]  Yan Tang,et al.  Elicitation and analysis of a corpus of robust noise-induced word misperceptions in Spanish , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[9]  María Luisa García Lecumberri,et al.  A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Antonio Quilis Frecuencia de fonémas en el español hablado , 1980 .

[11]  Doroteo Torre Toledano,et al.  INVENTARIO DE FRECUENCIAS FONMICAS Y SILBICAS DEL CASTELLANO ESPONTNEO Y ESCRITO , 2006 .

[12]  Martin Cooke Discovering consistent word confusions in noise , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[13]  Manuel Perea,et al.  EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[14]  Z. S. Bond,et al.  Morphological Errors in Casual Conversation , 1999, Brain and Language.

[16]  Pierre Delattre,et al.  Syllabic features and phonic impression in English, German, French and Spanish , 1969 .

[17]  Anne Cutler,et al.  There's many a slip 'twixt the cup and the lip , 2004 .