Decoding Brain States during Auditory Perception by Supervising Unsupervised Learning

The last years have seen a rise of interest in using electroencephalography-based brain computer interfacing methodology for investigating non-medical questions, beyond the purpose of communication and control. One of these novel applications is to examine how signal quality is being processed neurally, which is of particular interest for industry, besides providing neuroscientific insights. As for most behavioral experiments in the neurosciences, the assessment of a given stimulus by a subject is required. Based on an EEG study on speech quality of phonemes, we will first discuss the information contained in the neural correlate of this judgement. Typically, this is done by analyzing the data along behavioral responses/labels. However, participants in such complex experiments often guess at the threshold of perception. This leads to labels that are only partly correct, and oftentimes random, which is a problematic scenario for using supervised learning. Therefore, we propose a novel supervised-unsupervised learning scheme, which aims to differentiate true labels from random ones in a data-driven way. We show that this approach provides a more crisp view of the brain states that experimenters are looking for, besides discovering additional brain states to which the classical analysis is blind.

[1]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Analyzing Speech Quality Perception Using Electroencephalography , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[2]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  서정연,et al.  Journal of Computing Science and Engineering(JCSE)의 국제화 작업 , 2010 .

[4]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[5]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[6]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  ERP assessment of word processing under broadcast bit rate limitations , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Improving BCI performance by task-related trial pruning , 2009, Neural Networks.

[8]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Analyzing Local Structure in Kernel-Based Learning: Explanation, Complexity, and Reliability Assessment , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  K. Müller,et al.  Single-trial analysis of the neural correlates of speech quality perception , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  José del R. Millán,et al.  An Introduction to Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2007 .

[13]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Classifying Single Trial EEG: Towards Brain Computer Interfacing , 2001, NIPS.

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Revealing the neural response to imperceptible peripheral flicker with machine learning , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naive subjects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  Toward a Direct Measure of Video Quality Perception Using EEG , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm , 2000, NIPS.

[20]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Using ERPs for assessing the (sub) conscious perception of noise , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[22]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[23]  K. Müller,et al.  Finding stationary subspaces in multivariate time series. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[24]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning , 1995 .

[25]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  W. Polonik Measuring Mass Concentrations and Estimating Density Contour Clusters-An Excess Mass Approach , 1995 .

[27]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine-Learning-Based Coadaptive Calibration for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2011, Neural Computation.

[28]  José del R. Millán,et al.  General Signal Processing and Machine Learning Tools for BCI Analysis , 2007 .

[29]  Siamac Fazli,et al.  Brain Computer Interfacing: A Multi-Modal Perspective , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..

[30]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[31]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[32]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[33]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..