Methodology for evaluating image-segmentation algorithms

The purpose of this paper is to describe a framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. Image segmentation consists of object recognition and delineation. For evaluating segmentation methods, three factors - precision (reproducibility), accuracy (agreement with truth, validity), and efficiency (time taken) - need to be considered for both recognition and delineation. To assess precision, we need to choose a figure of merit, repeat segmentation considering all sources of variation, and determine variations in figure of merit via statistical analysis. It is impossible usually to establish true segmentation. Hence, to assess accuracy, we need to choose a surrogate of true segmentation and proceed as for precision. In determining accuracy, it may be important to consider different landmark areas of the structure to be segmented depending on the application. To assess efficiency, both the computational and the user time required for algorithm and operator training and for algorithm execution should be measured and analyzed. Precision, accuracy, and efficiency are interdependent. It is difficult to improve one factor without affecting others. Segmentation methods must be compared based on all three factors. The weight given to each factor depends on application.

[1]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Analysis of in vivo 3-D internal kinematics of the joints of the foot [MRI analysis] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation: Theory, Algorithms, and Validation , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Image segmentation based on the integration of pixel affinity and deformable models , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[4]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Interactive segmentation and boundary surface formation for 3-D digital images , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[5]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Artery-vein separation via MRA-An image processing approach , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Boundary Detection in Multidimensions , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  C Imelińska,et al.  Semi-automated color segmentation of anatomical tissue. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[10]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New automatic mode of visualizing the colon via Cine CT , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Brain tumor segmentation in MRI by using the fuzzy connectedness method , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Fuzzy Connectedness and Object Definition: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications in Image Segmentation , 1996, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[13]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Technique for evaluation of semiautomatic segmentation methods , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Near-automatic quantification of breast tissue glandularity via digitized mammograms , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Stephen M. Pizer,et al.  Robust object representation through object-relevant use of scale , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[16]  X FalcãoAlexandre,et al.  User-steered image segmentation paradigms , 1998 .

[17]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  User-Steered Image Segmentation Paradigms: Live Wire and Live Lane , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations , 1987 .

[20]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Multiple sclerosis lesion quantification using fuzzy-connectedness principles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M S Brown,et al.  Knowledge-Based Segmentation of Pediatric Kidneys in CT for Measurement of Parenchymal Volume , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Automatic bone-free rendering of cerebral aneurysms via 3D CTA , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[23]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Hybrid Segmentation of Anatomical Data , 2001, MICCAI.

[24]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  A 3D generalization of user-steered live-wire segmentation , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Relative Fuzzy Connectedness among Multiple Objects: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications in Image Segmentation , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[26]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated 3D Segmentation Using Deformable Models and Fuzzy Affinity , 1997, IPMI.