Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment.

This paper reports the environmental results, integrated with those arising from mass and energy balances, of a research project on the comparative analysis of strategies for material and energy recovery from waste, funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. The project, involving the cooperation of five University research groups, was devoted to the optimisation of material and energy recovery activities within integrated municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. Four scenarios of separate collection (overall value of 35%, 50% without the collection of food waste, 50% including the collection of food waste, 65%) were defined for the implementation of energetic, environmental and economic balances. Two sizes of integrated MSW management system (IWMS) were considered: a metropolitan area, with a gross MSW production of 750,000 t/year and an average province, with a gross MSW production of 150,000 t/year. The environmental analysis was conducted using Life Cycle Assessment methodology (LCA), for both material and energy recovery activities. In order to avoid allocation we have used the technique of the expansion of the system boundaries. This means taking into consideration the impact on the environment related to the waste management activities in comparison with the avoided impacts related to the saving of raw materials and primary energy. Under the hypotheses of the study, both for the large and for the small IWMS, the energetic and environmental benefits are higher than the energetic and environmental impacts for all the scenarios analysed in terms of all the indicators considered: the scenario with 50% separate collection in a drop-off scheme excluding food waste shows the most promising perspectives, mainly arising from the highest collection (and recycling) of all the packaging materials, which is the activity giving the biggest energetic and environmental benefits. Main conclusions of the study in the general field of the assessment of the environmental performance of any integrated waste management scheme address the importance of properly defining, beyond the design value assumed for the separate collection as a whole, also the yields of each material recovered; particular significance is finally related to the amount of residues deriving from material recovery activities, resulting on average in the order of 20% of the collected materials.

[1]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective , 2005 .

[2]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[4]  Fatih Karakoyun,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2008 .

[5]  P. H. Abelson.  Waste management. , 1985, Science.

[6]  M Giugliano,et al.  Primary and secondary components of PM2.5 in Milan (Italy). , 2008, Environment international.

[7]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[8]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini.  Applying LCA to organic waste management in Piedmont, Italy , 2008 .

[9]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 2: landfilling compared to other treatment methods , 2005 .

[10]  G. Rebitzera,et al.  Life cycle assessment Part 1 : Framework , goal and scope definition , inventory analysis , and applications , 2004 .

[11]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[12]  R. Clift,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Paper Waste Management Options by Means of LCA Methodology , 2004 .

[13]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Optimal strategies for the recovery of material and energy from MSW , 2008 .

[14]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Influence of assumptions about selection and recycling efficiencies on the LCA of integrated waste management systems , 2009 .

[15]  Mario Grosso,et al.  Riciclo dei rifiuti – Analisi del ciclo di vita dei materiali da imballaggio , 2009 .

[16]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[17]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies , 2007 .

[18]  Paolo S Calabrò,et al.  Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection. , 2009, Waste management.

[19]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[20]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[21]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems , 1999 .

[22]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system. , 2009, Waste management.

[23]  S Consonni,et al.  Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste Part A: Mass and energy balances. , 2005, Waste management.

[24]  P Buttol,et al.  LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna District. , 2007, Waste management.

[25]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[26]  Lucia Rigamonti,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sub-units composing a MSW management system , 2010 .

[27]  L Rigamonti,et al.  Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. , 2009, Waste management.