Accuracy of data acquisition approaches with ground penetrating radar for subsurface utility mapping

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is widely used in subsurface utility mapping for extracting the position (x, y) and depth (z) information of the utility. This information is crucial for subsurface facility management, in particular as reference in excavation works. The locational and depth information of the utility features is therefore of very important in subsurface mapping, apart from the reliability of the entire data acquisition and information retrieval method. This study investigates the effects of GPR data acquisition techniques to the locational and depth accuracy retrieved. The techniques examined are: (i) widely used perpendicular to pipe scanning; (ii) along pipe scanning; and (iii) variation angles scanning. Results indicated that along pipe scanning reported better penetrative power, higher detectability and best detection accuracy. Most importantly, this acquisition accuracy conforms to Quality Level A utility data requirements of the utility industries, hence offers the opportunities of GPR as measuring tool for underground cadastre system.

[1]  A. Toropainen Measurement of the Properties of Granular Materials by Microwave Backscattering , 1995 .

[2]  Antonios Giannopoulos,et al.  The investigation of transmission-line matrix and finite-difference time-domain methods for the forward problem of ground probing radar , 1998 .

[3]  S. Shihab,et al.  Radius Estimation for Cylindrical Objects Detected by Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[4]  D. Daniels Ground Penetrating Radar , 2005 .

[5]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Soil moisture content estimation using ground-penetrating radar reflection data , 2005 .

[6]  David Chapman,et al.  Mapping the Underworld – State-of-the-art review , 2007 .

[7]  Seong-Jun Cho,et al.  Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing , 2007 .

[8]  Nicole Metje,et al.  Underground asset location and condition assessment technologies , 2007 .

[9]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground penetrating radar : theory and applications , 2009 .

[10]  L. Jones,et al.  Predictive mapping of soil geophysical properties for GPR utility location surveys , 2009 .

[11]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  A new method to simultaneously estimate the radius of a cylindrical object and the wave propagation velocity from GPR data , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker,et al.  Evaluation of the root mean square error performance of the PAST-Consensus algorithm , 2010, 2010 International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA).

[13]  L. Seyfi,et al.  A novel software for an energy efficient GPR , 2010, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[14]  N. J. Cassidy,et al.  Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi-threaded approach to 3D FDTD numerical modelling , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  Sheng-Huoo Ni,et al.  Buried pipe detection by ground penetrating radar using the discrete wavelet transform , 2010 .

[16]  Evert Slob,et al.  Comparing detection and location performance of perpendicular and parallel broadside GPR antenna orientations , 2010 .

[17]  C. Ozdemir,et al.  On the imaging applications of ground penetrating radar , 2010, 2010 URSI International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory.