Social Bayes: Using Bayesian Modeling to Study Autistic Trait–Related Differences in Social Cognition

BACKGROUND Autism is characterized by impairments of social interaction, but the underlying subpersonal processes are still a matter of controversy. It has been suggested that the autistic spectrum might be characterized by alterations of the brain's inference on the causes of socially relevant signals. However, it is unclear at what level of processing such trait-related alterations may occur. METHODS We used a reward-based learning task that requires the integration of nonsocial and social cues in conjunction with computational modeling. Healthy subjects (N = 36) were selected based on their Autism Quotient Spectrum (AQ) score, and AQ scores were assessed for correlations with model parameters and task scores. RESULTS Individual differences in AQ were inversely correlated with participants' task scores (r = -.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-.68, -.13]). Moreover, AQ scores were significantly correlated with a social weighting parameter that indicated how strongly the decision was influenced by the social cue (r = -.42, 95% CI [-.66, -.19]), but not with other model parameters. Also, more pronounced social weighting was related to higher scores (r = .50, 95% CI [.20, .86]). CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that higher autistic traits in healthy subjects are related to lower scores in a learning task that requires social cue integration. Computational modeling further demonstrates that these trait-related performance differences are not explained by an inability to process the social stimuli and its causes, but rather by the extent to which participants take into account social information during decision making.

[1]  L. Schilbach,et al.  On the relationship of online and offline social cognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  C. Mathys,et al.  Computational approaches to psychiatry , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  F. Happé,et al.  Evidence that autistic traits show the same etiology in the general population and at the quantitative extremes (5%, 2.5%, and 1%). , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  Inferring on the Intentions of Others by Hierarchical Bayesian Learning , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  C. Schmitz,et al.  Decision-Making in a Changing World: A Study in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2014, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[6]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Shall we do this together? Social gaze influences action control in a comparison group, but not in individuals with high-functioning autism , 2012, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[7]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Computational Psychiatry , 2015 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Observing the Observer (II): Deciding When to Decide , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Observing the Observer (I): Meta-Bayesian Models of Learning and Decision-Making , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  U. Frith,et al.  Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome , 2009, Science.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Computational psychiatry: the brain as a phantastic organ. , 2014, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[12]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Precise minds in uncertain worlds: predictive coding in autism. , 2014, Psychological review.

[13]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Reflecting on the mirror neuron system in autism: A systematic review of current theories , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  On Hyperpriors and Hypopriors: Comment on Pellicano and Burr , 2022 .

[15]  R. Held,et al.  Autism as a disorder of prediction , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  A model-based analysis of impulsivity using a slot-machine gambling paradigm , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[18]  L. Schilbach Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[19]  A. Seth,et al.  The felt presence of other minds: Predictive processing, counterfactual predictions, and mentalising in autism , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Bayesian Foundation for Individual Learning Under Uncertainty , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Mark W Woolrich,et al.  Associative learning of social value , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Burr,et al.  When the world becomes ‘too real’: a Bayesian explanation of autistic perception , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Computational psychiatry , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  G. Rees,et al.  Adults with autism over-estimate the volatility of the sensory environment , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  C. Mathys,et al.  Hierarchical Prediction Errors in Midbrain and Basal Forebrain during Sensory Learning , 2013, Neuron.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Computational psychiatry (vol 16, pg 72, 2012) , 2012 .

[30]  Peter Neri,et al.  Action Perception Is Intact in Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Neuroscience Hypothesis and Theory Article an Aberrant Precision Account of Autism , 2022 .

[32]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Screening Adults for Asperger Syndrome Using the AQ: A Preliminary Study of its Diagnostic Validity in Clinical Practice , 2005, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.