High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management--Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters.

The high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) process is a technology suitable for the removal and redirection of organics from wastewater to energy generating processes in an efficient manner. A HRAS pilot plant was operated under controlled conditions resulting in concentrating the influent particulate, colloidal, and soluble COD to a waste solids stream with minimal energy input by maximizing sludge production, bacterial storage, and bioflocculation. The impact of important process parameters such as solids retention time (SRT), hydraulic residence time (HRT) and dissolved oxygen (DO) levels on the performance of a HRAS system was demonstrated in a pilot study. The results showed that maximum removal efficiencies of soluble COD were reached at a DO > 0.3 mg O2/L, SRT > 0.5 days and HRT > 15 min which indicates that minimizing the oxidation of the soluble COD in the high-rate activated sludge process is difficult. The study of DO, SRT and HRT exhibited high degree of impact on the colloidal and particulate COD removal. Thus, more attention should be focused on controlling the removal of these COD fractions. Colloidal COD removal plateaued at a DO > 0.7 mg O2/L, SRT > 1.5 days and HRT > 30 min, similar to particulate COD removal. Concurrent increase in extracellular polymers (EPS) production in the reactor and the association of particulate and colloidal material into sludge flocs (bioflocculation) indicated carbon capture by biomass. The SRT impacted the overall mass and energy balance of the high-rate process indicating that at low SRT conditions, lower COD mineralization or loss of COD content occurred. In addition, the lower SRT conditions resulted in higher sludge yields and higher COD content in the WAS.

[1]  Arthur M. Buswell,et al.  Microbiology and Theory of Activated Sludge , 1923 .

[2]  B. Rittmann,et al.  A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. , 2002, Water research.

[3]  M. Turakhia,et al.  Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms: Effect of calcium , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  Hanqing Yu,et al.  Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: a review. , 2010, Biotechnology advances.

[5]  K. Keiding,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin , 1996 .

[6]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[7]  S. Hermanowicz,et al.  Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics. , 2005, Water research.

[8]  Jan Dolfing,et al.  Low-temperature limitation of bioreactor sludge in anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. , 2014, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  Jeonghwan Kim,et al.  Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  N. Ren,et al.  Linking microbial community structure to membrane biofouling associated with varying dissolved oxygen concentrations. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[11]  H. K. Winkler,et al.  Comparison of single-stage and two-stage activated sludge processes for the expansion of the Innsbruck WWTP , 1994 .

[12]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Energy Content of Unknown Organics in Municipal Wastewater Streams , 2004 .

[13]  Denny S Parker,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on the removal of particulate chemical oxygen demand in the activated sludge process. , 2007, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[14]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Biological wastewater treatment. , 2011 .

[15]  P. Lant,et al.  The influence of key chemical constituents in activated sludge on surface and flocculating properties. , 2003, Water research.

[16]  Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Towards a more sustainable municipal wastewater treatment system , 1997 .

[17]  Denny S Parker,et al.  Kinetics of Removal of Particulate Chemical Oxygen Demand in the Activated‐Sludge Process , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[18]  Thomas P. Curtis,et al.  Determination of the internal chemical energy of wastewater. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  David Jenkins,et al.  A rapid physical-chemical method for the determination of readily biodegradable soluble COD in municipal wastewater , 1993 .

[20]  Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Nutrient Removal Processes: Case Study , 1997 .

[21]  W. Verstraete,et al.  ZeroWasteWater: short-cycling of wastewater resources for sustainable cities of the future , 2011 .

[22]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[23]  H. Temmink,et al.  Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on the bioflocculation process in high loaded MBRs. , 2014, Water research.

[24]  P. Harremoës,et al.  Processes and modeling of hydrolysis of particulate organic matter in aerobic wastewater treatment--a review. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  Bruce E Rittmann,et al.  Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. , 2002, Water research.

[26]  Ime Akanyeti,et al.  Feasibility of bioflocculation in a high-loaded membrane bioreactor for improved energy recovery from sewage. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.