Performance assessment of fused deposition modeling process

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is an additive manufacturing process that offers numerous benefits in terms of simplicity, ease of operation, material strength, flexibility, etc. However, its fabricated parts are frequently affected by poor dimensional and geometrical accuracy. Therefore, it is very important to understand the different sources of error in FDM so that appropriate measures can be taken to overcome its limitations. In this work, an attempt has been made to quantify the different sources of error which contribute to the poor accuracy of FDM fabricated parts. For this reason, a standard part (also referred to as benchmark part) which is comprised of various shapes, features and geometries have been used for the evaluation of the FDM process. The primary objective of this work is to characterize the FDM process in terms of dimensional and geometrical accuracy. Although, this research is specific to a particular machine, however, it would provide useful information regarding the procedure that can be employed when a benchmark part is utilized. This work can also act as a foundation to further improve the FDM machine design and expand its applications.

[1]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Rapid investment casting: direct and indirect approaches via fused deposition modelling , 2004 .

[2]  Milan Kljajin,et al.  Geometric Accuracy by 2-D Printing Model , 2008 .

[3]  Chua Chee Kai,et al.  Rapid prototyping issues in the 21st century , 1999 .

[4]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Investigating the achievable accuracy of three dimensional printing , 2006 .

[5]  N. Hopkinson,et al.  A new benchmarking part for evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of Additive Manufacturing ( AM ) processes , 2012 .

[6]  Jiming Liu,et al.  Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[7]  Anish Sachdeva,et al.  Investigation of Dimensional Accuracy/Mechanical Properties of Part Produced by Selective Laser Sintering , 2012 .

[8]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes , 2004 .

[9]  Seok-Hee Lee,et al.  Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[10]  Kevin K. Jurrens,et al.  An Additive Manufacturing Test Artifact , 2014, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[11]  Joaquim Ciurana,et al.  Selecting Process Parameters in RepRap Additive Manufacturing System for PLA Scaffolds Manufacture , 2013 .

[12]  Mohd Rizal Alkahari,et al.  Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance , 2010 .

[13]  J. Kruth,et al.  Benchmarking of different SLS/SLM processes as Rapid Manufacturing techniques , 2005 .

[14]  Dominique Scaravetti,et al.  Qualification of rapid prototyping tools: proposition of a procedure and a test part , 2008 .

[15]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method , 2009 .

[16]  Alfredo Ramirez,et al.  Improving on the Range Rule of Thumb , 2012 .