Comparison of DNA methylation measured by Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood of newborns and 14-year-old children

ABSTRACT Analysis of DNA methylation helps to understand the effects of environmental exposures as well as the role of epigenetics in human health. Illumina, Inc. recently replaced the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450K) with the EPIC BeadChip, which nearly doubles the measured CpG sites to >850,000. Although the new chip uses the same underlying technology, it is important to establish if data between the two platforms are comparable within cohorts and for meta-analyses. DNA methylation was assessed by 450K and EPIC using whole blood from newborn (n = 109) and 14-year-old (n = 86) participants of the Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas. The overall per-sample correlations were very high (r >0.99), although many individual CpG sites, especially those with low variance of methylation, had lower correlations (median r = 0.24). There was also a small subset of CpGs with large mean methylation β-value differences between platforms, in both the newborn and 14-year datasets. However, estimates of cell type proportion prediction by 450K and EPIC were highly correlated at both ages. Finally, differentially methylated positions between boys and girls replicated very well by both platforms in newborns and older children. These findings are encouraging for application of combined data from EPIC and 450K platforms for birth cohorts and other population studies. These data in children corroborate recent comparisons of the two BeadChips in adults and in cancer cell lines. However, researchers should be cautious when characterizing individual CpG sites and consider independent methods for validation of significant hits.

[1]  Ivana V. Yang,et al.  Cohort Profile: Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) Consortium , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  W. Milberg,et al.  The correlation of methylation levels measured using Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood samples , 2017, Epigenomics.

[3]  Stephen Rauch,et al.  Association of prenatal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and childhood BMI and obesity , 2017, Pediatric Research.

[4]  A. Wenger,et al.  Validation of the MethylationEPIC BeadChip for fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours , 2017, Clinical Epigenetics.

[5]  Ivana V. Yang,et al.  Small-Magnitude Effect Sizes in Epigenetic End Points are Important in Children’s Environmental Health Studies: The Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research Center’s Epigenetics Working Group , 2017, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Anushya Muruganujan,et al.  PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from Gene Ontology and Reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Peter W. Laird,et al.  Comprehensive characterization, annotation and innovative use of Infinium DNA methylation BeadChip probes , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Timothy J. Peters,et al.  Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling , 2016, Genome Biology.

[9]  Shan V Andrews,et al.  DNA methylation of cord blood cell types: Applications for mixed cell birth studies , 2016, Epigenetics.

[10]  Brenda Eskenazi,et al.  Sex differences in DNA methylation assessed by 450 K BeadChip in newborns , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays , 2014, Bioinform..

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  Anna Decker,et al.  Considerations for normalization of DNA methylation data by Illumina 450K BeadChip assay in population studies , 2013, Epigenetics.

[14]  R. Weksberg,et al.  Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray , 2013, Epigenetics.

[15]  Pau Farré,et al.  Additional annotation enhances potential for biologically-relevant analysis of the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array , 2013, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[16]  Devin C. Koestler,et al.  DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  K. Gunderson,et al.  High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. , 2011, Genomics.

[18]  M. Esteller,et al.  Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome , 2011, Epigenetics.

[19]  K. Beckman,et al.  Paraoxonase Polymorphisms, Haplotypes, and Enzyme Activity in Latino Mothers and Newborns , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2004, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[21]  N. Holland,et al.  CHAMACOS, A Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study: Lessons from the Fields , 2003 .