Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products

Abstract We present and discuss ecological footprint (EF) calculations for a large number of products and services consumed in the western economy. Product-specific EFs were calculated from consistent and quality-controlled life cycle information of 2630 products and services, including energy, materials, transport, waste treatment and infrastructural processes. We formed 19 homogeneous product/process subgroups for further analysis, containing in total 1549 processes. Per group, the average contribution of two types of land occupation (direct and energy related) to the total EF was derived. It was found that the ecological footprint of the majority of products is dominated by the consumption of non-renewable energy. Notable exceptions are the EFs of biomass energy, hydro energy, paper and cardboard, and agricultural products with a relatively high contribution of direct land occupation. We also compared the ecological footprint results with the results of a commonly used life cycle impact assessment method, the Ecoindicator 99 (EI). It was found that the majority of the products have an EF/EI ratio of around 30 m 2 -eq. yr/ecopoint ± a factor of 5. The typical ratio reduces to 25 m 2  yr/ecopoints by excluding the arbitrary EF for nuclear energy demand. The relatively small variation of this ratio implies that the use of land and use of fossil fuels are important drivers of overall environmental impact. Ecological footprints may therefore serve as a screening indicator for environmental performance. However, our results also show that the usefulness of EF as a stand-alone indicator for environmental impact is limited for product life cycles with relative high mineral consumption and process-specific metal and dust emissions. For these products the EF/EI ratio can substantially deviate from the average value. Finally, we suggest that the ecological footprint product data provided in this paper can be used to improve the footprint estimates of production, import and export of products on a national scale and footprint estimates of various lifestyles.

[1]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  Strategic sustainable development — selection, design and synergies of applied tools , 2002 .

[2]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Introduction The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework , 2004 .

[3]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification in Europe - A Critical Evaluation (7 pp) , 2005 .

[4]  Karl-Henrik Robèrt,et al.  Tools and concepts for sustainable development, how do they relate to a general framework for sustainable development, and to each other? , 2000 .

[5]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Assessment of Land Use Impacts on the Natural Environment. Part 1: An Analytical Framework for Pure Land Occupation and Land Use Change (8 pp) , 2007 .

[6]  Karl Georg Høyer,et al.  The ecological footprints of fuels , 2005 .

[7]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Developments in Wood and Packaging Materials Life Cycle Inventories in ecoinvent (9 pp) , 2005 .

[8]  Colin Hunter,et al.  Sustainable Tourism and the Touristic Ecological Footprint , 2002 .

[9]  Colin Hunter,et al.  Household ecological footprinting using a new diary-based data-gathering approach , 2006 .

[10]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[11]  C. Folke,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPT FOR SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD PRODUCTION: A REVIEW , 1998 .

[12]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[13]  C. J. Sliggers,et al.  The Impact of Atmospheric Deposition of Non-Acidifying Substances on the Quality of European Forest Soils and the North Sea , 1999 .

[14]  E. Hirst,et al.  Food-Related Energy Requirements , 1974, Science.

[15]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Uncertainty in Impact and Externality Assessments - Implications for Decision-Making (13 pp) , 2006 .

[16]  John Holmberg,et al.  The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability , 1999 .

[17]  Roberto Dones,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies: Case Studies for Photovoltaic and Wind Power (11 pp) , 2005 .

[18]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[19]  John Holmberg,et al.  Socio-ecological Indicators for Sustainability. , 1996 .

[20]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  On the conversion between local and global hectares in Ecological Footprint analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[23]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps , 2000 .

[24]  G L MADDOX,et al.  A critical evaluation , 2012 .

[25]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method , 2005 .

[26]  Peter F. Chapman,et al.  1. Energy costs: a review of methods , 1974 .

[27]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[28]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments , 2004 .

[29]  Gernot Stöglehner,et al.  Ecological footprint — a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies , 2003 .

[30]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods , 1997 .

[32]  EATING UP THE EARTH: HOW SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS SHRINK OUR ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT , 2003 .

[33]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Ecosystem Appropriation by Cities , 1996 .

[34]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability , 2000 .

[35]  J. Shaw,et al.  Applying the ecological footprint to ecotourism scenarios , 2005, Environmental Conservation.

[36]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Ecological Footprints in Plural: A Meta-analytic Comparison of Empirical Results , 2004 .

[37]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the Ecological Footprint , 2007 .

[38]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Human health damages due to ionising radiation in life cycle impact assessment , 2000 .

[39]  C. Folke,et al.  Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and tilapia aquaculture , 1997 .

[40]  M. Lenzen,et al.  A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia , 2001 .

[41]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[42]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Site‐Dependent Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment of Acidification , 1998 .

[43]  M. J. Goedkoop.  The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained , 1998 .

[44]  N. Chambers,et al.  Footprinting UK households: How big is your ecological garden? , 1998 .