Use of factorial experimental approach and effect size on the CBR testing results for the usable dosages of wastewater sludge ash with coarse-grained material

There is an inadequate attempt to make a decision on the accuracy and reliability of the effectively usable dosage rates of sewage sludge ash (SSA) for replacement and improvement of coarse-grained soil. This study introduces an investigation on the effectively usable dosages of SSA for subbase construction by using factorial experimental approach and effect size estimation. California bearing ratio (CBR) tests have been carried out to measure the parameters of CBR value, energy absorption capacity (Ed) and ultimate bearing capacity (qu) of the soil + SSA mixtures for which proportions were 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60% by dry weight of the mixture. The effectively usable dosages of SSA for both improvement and substitute in highway construction, based on the foregoing parameters, have been assessed essentially using multiple comparison tests and effect size parameters (omega-squared, eta-squared and Cohen’s d). The results of statistical analysis demonstrate that while there is an insignificantly variation (increase or decrease) (p > .05 and Cohen’s d ≤ .41) at the dosage rates of 5 and 15% for CBR, 15% for Ed and 5, 20, 30 and 40% for qu, there is a significant decrease (p ≤ .05 and Cohen’s d > 2.7) in the values of CBR, Ed and qu due to the addition of SSA at the dosages of 50, 50 and 60%, respectively. Accordingly, it is suggested that SSA be introduced into sandy soil for improvement or replacement at the dosage rates less than 50% in the stabilisation applications. From the statistical analysis performed here, it is also found that multiple comparison tests and effect size estimates compare well in the decision-making.

[1]  S. R. Kaniraj,et al.  Behavior of Cement-Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Fly Ash-Soil Mixtures , 2001 .

[2]  Yun-Tae Kim,et al.  Effect of bottom ash particle size on strength development in composite geomaterial , 2012 .

[3]  H. Dines ‘Soil’ Mechanics , 1944, Nature.

[4]  Pedro Domingos Marques Prietto,et al.  Engineering Behavior of a Sand Reinforced with Plastic Waste , 2002 .

[5]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[6]  I. Shooshpasha,et al.  Experimental Study on Load-Settlement Behaviour of Cement Stabilised Footing with Different Dimensions on Sandy Soil , 2015 .

[7]  Kenan Hazirbaba,et al.  California Bearing Ratio improvement and freeze–thaw performance of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid , 2010 .

[8]  M. Arshad,et al.  The California bearing ratio (CBR) value for banting soft soil subgrade stabilized using lime-pofa mixtures , 2014 .

[9]  Peter R. Nelson,et al.  A Comparison of Sample Sizes for the Analysis of Means and the Analysis of Variance , 1983 .

[10]  P. Hicher,et al.  Permeability and porosity improvement of grouted sand , 2011 .

[11]  R. A. Waller,et al.  A Bayes Rule for the Symmetric Multiple Comparisons Problem , 1969 .

[12]  Wei-Hsing Huang,et al.  The Use of Bottom Ash in Highway Embankments, Subgrades, and Subbases , 1990 .

[13]  Kae‐Long Lin,et al.  Sludge ash/hydrated lime on the geotechnical properties of soft soil. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  D. Lin,et al.  Stabilization treatment of soft subgrade soil by sewage sludge ash and cement. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  C. Ferguson Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review , 2007 .

[16]  Ns Pandian,et al.  California bearing ratio behavior of cement-stabilized fly ash-soil mixes , 2002 .

[17]  W. Black,et al.  The Calculation of Laboratory and In-situ Values of California Bearing Ratio from Bearing Capacity Data , 1961 .

[18]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Ing-Jia Chiou,et al.  Lightweight properties and pore structure of foamed material made from sewage sludge ash , 2005 .

[20]  Hamza Güllü,et al.  Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze–thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid , 2010 .

[21]  Hamza Güllü,et al.  Factorial experimental approach for effective dosage rate of stabilizer: Application for fine-grained soil treated with bottom ash , 2014 .

[22]  J. Hess,et al.  Analysis of variance , 2018, Transfusion.

[23]  Christopher R. Cheeseman,et al.  Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity , 2010 .

[24]  Emma B. Saxon Multiple comparisons , 2015, BMC Biology.

[25]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[26]  R. A. Waller,et al.  A Bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem II , 1974 .

[27]  Abdul Shakoor,et al.  Variability of unconfined compressive strength in relation to number of test samples , 2009 .

[28]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[29]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Case study involving using fluidised bed incinerator sludge ash as a partial clay substitute in brick manufacture , 1996 .

[30]  Christopher A. Sink,et al.  Practical Significance:The Use of Effect Sizes in School Counseling Research , 2006 .

[31]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[32]  Deng-Fong Lin,et al.  A Comparison between Sludge Ash and Fly Ash on the Improvement in Soft Soil , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[35]  Jordi Payá,et al.  Use of sewage sludge ash(SSA)-cement admixtures in mortars , 1996 .

[36]  Chihpin Huang,et al.  Recycling MSWI bottom and fly ash as raw materials for Portland cement. , 2008, Waste management.

[37]  C. Ferguson An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. , 2009 .

[38]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. , 1967 .

[39]  M. Devant,et al.  Custom formulation of red ceramics with clay, sewage sludge and forest waste , 2011 .

[40]  The Effects of Sludge Ash on the Strength of Soft Subgrade Soil , 2005 .