Transforming clinical imaging and 3D data for virtual reality learning objects: HTML5 and mobile devices implementation

Web deployable anatomical simulations or “virtual reality learning objects” can easily be produced with QuickTime VR software, but their use for online and mobile learning is being limited by the declining support for web browser plug‐ins for personal computers and unavailability on popular mobile devices like Apple iPad and Android tablets. This article describes complementary methods for creating comparable, multiplatform VR learning objects in the new HTML5 standard format, circumventing platform‐specific limitations imposed by the QuickTime VR multimedia file format. Multiple types or “dimensions” of anatomical information can be embedded in such learning objects, supporting different kinds of online learning applications, including interactive atlases, examination questions, and complex, multi‐structure presentations. Such HTML5 VR learning objects are usable on new mobile devices that do not support QuickTime VR, as well as on personal computers. Furthermore, HTML5 VR learning objects can be embedded in “ebook” document files, supporting the development of new types of electronic textbooks on mobile devices that are increasingly popular and self‐adopted for mobile learning. Anat Sci Educ 6: 263–270. © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  Mark Pilgrim,et al.  HTML5: Up and Running , 2010 .

[2]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[4]  Gary L Nieder,et al.  An eight‐year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  Robert B. Trelease.  Toward virtual anatomy: A stereoscopic 3‐D interactive multimedia computer program for cranial osteology , 1996, Clinical anatomy.

[6]  Matthew D B S Tam,et al.  Building virtual models by postprocessing radiology images: A guide for anatomy faculty , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  Erny Arniza Ahmad,et al.  The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning : A discussion , 2010 .

[8]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Web‐based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[9]  I. Haq,et al.  Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students - a mixed methods study , 2012, BMC Medical Education.

[10]  Frank Nagy,et al.  Preserving and sharing examples of anatomical variation and developmental anomalies via photorealistic virtual reality. , 2004, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[11]  B. Dala-ali,et al.  The uses of the iPhone for surgeons. , 2011, The Surgeon.

[12]  Graham Walton,et al.  Using mobile technologies to give health students access to learning resources in the UK community setting. , 2005, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  John A McNulty,et al.  Evaluation of computer‐aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six‐year study , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  S. Kavic,et al.  Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[16]  R. Trelease.  Diffusion of innovations: Smartphones and wireless anatomy learning resources , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[17]  Robert B Trelease,et al.  Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[18]  J. A. Mcnulty,et al.  Personality preference influences medical student use of specific computer-aided instruction (CAI) , 2006, BMC medical education.

[19]  R B Trelease.  The virtual anatomy practical: A stereoscopic 3D interactive multimedia computer examination program , 1998, Clinical anatomy.

[20]  Gary L. Nieder,et al.  Medical Student Use of Online Lectures: Exam Performance, Learning Styles, Achievement Motivation and Gender , 2011 .

[21]  Steven R Simon,et al.  How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) , 2002, BMC medical education.

[22]  Robert B Trelease,et al.  Anatomical informatics: Millennial perspectives on a newer frontier , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[23]  R. Leipzig,et al.  The impact of E-learning in medical education. , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  G L Nieder,et al.  Using QuickTime virtual reality objects in computer‐assisted instruction of gross anatomy: Yorick—the VR Skull , 2000, Clinical anatomy.

[25]  Antoine Rosset,et al.  Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): navigating the fifth dimension: innovative interface for multidimensional multimodality image navigation. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  R B Trelease,et al.  Going virtual with quicktime VR: New methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[27]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[28]  Jorge G Ruiz,et al.  Learning objects in medical education , 2006, Medical teacher.