fMRI Analysis with Sparse Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Statistics

fMRI analysis has most often been approached with linear methods. However, this disregards information encoded in the relationships between voxels. We propose to exploit the inherent spatial structure of the brain to improve the prediction performance of fMRI analysis. We do so in an exploratory fashion by representing the fMRI data by graphs. We use the Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm to efficiently compute subtree features of the graphs. These features encode non-linear interactions between voxels, which contain additional discriminative information that cannot be captured by a linear classifier. In order to make use of the efficiency of the Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm, we introduce a novel pyramid quantization strategy to approximate continuously labeled graphs with a sequence of discretely labeled graphs. To control the capacity of the resulting prediction function, we utilize the elastic net sparsity regularizer. We validate our method on a cocaine addiction dataset showing a significant improvement over elastic net and kernel ridge regression baselines and a reduction in classification error of over 14%. Source code is also available at https://gitorious.org/wlpyramid .

[1]  Rita Z. Goldstein,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  A. Ravishankar Rao,et al.  Prediction and interpretation of distributed neural activity with sparse models , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  New Results - Disrupted Small-world Networks in Schizophrenia , 2008 .

[4]  M. Rietschel,et al.  Creating probabilistic maps of the face network in the adolescent brain: A multicentre functional MRI study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[6]  Wenbin Li,et al.  Enriched white matter connectivity networks for accurate identification of MCI patients , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  The Pyramid Match Kernel: Efficient Learning with Sets of Features , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A projection pursuit algorithm to classify individuals using fMRI data: Application to schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2012 , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Matthew B. Blaschko,et al.  FMRI analysis of cocaine addiction using k-support sparsity , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[11]  S. V. N. Vishwanathan,et al.  Graph kernels , 2007 .

[12]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[13]  Jennifer Bramen,et al.  Effect of bupropion treatment on brain activation induced by cigarette-related cues in smokers. , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[14]  D. Long Networks of the Brain , 2011 .

[15]  Dimitris Samaras,et al.  Can a Single Brain Region Predict a Disorder? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Polina Golland,et al.  From Brain Connectivity Models to Identifying Foci of a Neurological Disorder , 2012, MICCAI.

[17]  Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Decoding brain states using backward edge elimination and graph kernels in fMRI connectivity networks , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Dimitris Samaras,et al.  Oral methylphenidate normalizes cingulate activity in cocaine addiction during a salient cognitive task , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernels , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Anna Rose Childress,et al.  Dopamine transporter genotype modulation of neural responses to smoking cues: confirmation in a new cohort , 2011, Addiction biology.

[22]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Training fMRI Classifiers to Discriminate Cognitive States across Multiple Subjects , 2003, NIPS.