An Investigation of Factors Influencing Private Technology Organizations' Intention to Adopt Open Government Data in Saudi Arabia

Governments around the world are increasingly riding the wave of the open government data initiative, in which governments share their data freely to be used and reused by various stakeholders to stimulate innovation and economic growth, as well as promoting transparency and accountability. Private technology organizations are considered to be key players in the open government data ecosystem. Therefore, governments globally endeavor to encourage these organizations to adopt open government data to develop new social and economic benefits, products and services. However, adopting open government data is not an easy process because it relies on several factors. This research aims to investigate factors that may influence the decision of an organization to adopt open government data in Saudi Arabia. We have developed an integrated model to seek to understand why some organizations are willing to adopt open government data while others are not. This model was designed by combining aspects of two conceptual constructs, the technology-organization-environment framework and the information systems success model. These theories were extended by the addition of three components, political leadership, culture and open data intermediaries, to cover the open government data adoption context.

[1]  Kit Yeng Sin,et al.  Relative Advantage and Competitive Pressure towards Implementation of E-commerce: Overview of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) , 2016 .

[2]  Alexander Andrason,et al.  Open Data Intermediaries in Developing Countries , 2016, J. Community Informatics.

[3]  David A. Griffith,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Investigation of New Product Strategies for Technological and Design Innovations , 2014 .

[4]  J. Dupree Techno‐Ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customers Adopt Technology , 2002 .

[5]  Agus Hermanto,et al.  The importance of open government data for the private sector and NGOs in Indonesia , 2018, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance.

[6]  Stuti Saxena,et al.  Open government data (OGD) in six Middle East countries: an evaluation of the national open data portals , 2018, Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance.

[7]  Yukun Bao,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh , 2019, Technology in Society.

[8]  María Verónica Alderete,et al.  The mediating role of ICT in the development of open government , 2018, Journal of Global Information Technology Management.

[9]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data , 2017 .

[10]  M. Janssen,et al.  Exploring the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data by Private Organisations , 2015 .

[11]  Johan Sandberg,et al.  Digital Service Innovation from Open Data: Exploring the Value Proposition of an Open Data Marketplace , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[12]  Serdar Temiz OPEN DATA AND INNOVATION ADOPTION: Lessons From Sweden , 2018 .

[13]  Kamel Fantazy,et al.  E-government adoption and user’s satisfaction: an empirical investigation , 2016 .

[14]  Jukka-Pekka Bergman,et al.  A firm’s age and size as determinants for its organizational innovativeness , 2018, Journal of Innovation Management.

[15]  Mohammad Salehan,et al.  Are there any relationships between technology and cultural values? A country-level trend study of the association between information communication technology and cultural values , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[16]  E. Ingelsson,et al.  Big Data and medicine: a big deal? , 2018, Journal of internal medicine.

[17]  Kyujin Jung,et al.  A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea's "Open Public Data" policy , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Mohammed Alsaif,et al.  Factors affecting citizens' adoption of e-government moderated by socio-cultural values in Saudi Arabia , 2014 .

[19]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  Open data hackathons: an innovative strategy to enhance entrepreneurial intention , 2018 .

[20]  Mohamed G. Aboelmaged,et al.  Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  Jui-Che Tu,et al.  A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals , 2018, Sustainability.

[22]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[23]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Tracking the Evolution of OGD Portals: A Maturity Model , 2017, EGOV.

[24]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Open data ecosystems: an international comparison , 2017 .

[25]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  Business Models for Open Data Ecosystem: Challenges and Motivations for Entrepreneurship and Innovation , 2017, 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

[26]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Deborah Richards,et al.  An Analysis of Interaction Between Users and Open Government Data Portals in Data Acquisition Process , 2018, PKAW.

[28]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Organizational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Hui-Ju Wang,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data at the Firm Level , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Robert Krimmer,et al.  How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a 'perfect storm'; insights from Chicago's food inspection forecasting model , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  M. Janssen,et al.  A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned , 2015 .

[33]  Cheah Jun-Hwa,et al.  B2B E-Commerce Adoption in Iranian Manufacturing Companies: Analyzing the Moderating Role of Organizational Culture , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Markus Helfert,et al.  Adoption of Open Government Data for Commercial Service Innovation: an Inductive Case Study on Parking Open Data Services , 2017, AMCIS.

[36]  Reinhard Riedl,et al.  Current Barriers to Open Government Data Use and Visualization by Political Intermediaries , 2016, 2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM).

[37]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[38]  Suniarti Sunny,et al.  Impact of cultural values on technology acceptance and technology readiness , 2019, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[39]  Wan Salihin Wong Abdullah,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Continuance Intention to Use E-Government , 2016 .

[40]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[41]  S. Jong,et al.  Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of Culture? , 2006 .

[42]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Evaluating Second Generation Open Government Data Infrastructures Using Value Models , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Katleen Janssen Open Government Data: Right to Information 2.0 or its Rollback Version? , 2012 .

[44]  Flávia Bernardini,et al.  A rationale for data governance as an approach to tackle recurrent drawbacks in open data portals , 2018, DG.O.

[45]  Renny,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Attitude Towards Online Shopping Usefulness Towards Online Airlines Ticket Purchase , 2013 .

[46]  M. Avital,et al.  The Value of Open Government Data: A Strategic Analysis Framework , 2012 .

[47]  Felix Olu Bankole,et al.  The effects of cultural dimension on ICT innovation: Empirical analysis of mobile phone services , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[48]  Mohammed Saleh Altayar,et al.  Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  Open Data and High-Tech Startups Towards Nascent Entrepreneurship Strategies , 2019, Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services.

[50]  Michael Gurstein,et al.  Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? , 2011, First Monday.

[51]  Giovanni Maccani,et al.  Exploring the factors that influence adoption of open government data for commercial service innovation in cities , 2016 .

[52]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Orazio Fusco Creating value through open data , 2014 .

[54]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Building e-Governance for Development: A Framework for National and Donor Action , 2001 .

[55]  Markus Freitag,et al.  GovWILD: integrating open government data for transparency , 2012, WWW.

[56]  Michael Potter,et al.  Adoption of computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology: an innovation adoption perspective , 1995, DATB.

[57]  Zlatko J. Kovacic,et al.  The Impact of National Culture on Worldwide eGovernment Readiness , 2005, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[58]  Stuti Saxena,et al.  Prospects of open government data (OGD) in facilitating the economic diversification of GCC region , 2017 .

[59]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Transparency Dimensions of Big and Open Linked Data - Transparency as Being Synonymous with Accountability and Openness , 2015, I3E.

[60]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Evangelos Kalampokis,et al.  On modeling linked open statistical data , 2019, J. Web Semant..

[62]  Bo Fan,et al.  Exploring open government data capacity of government agency: Based on the resource-based theory , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  Hossana Twinomurinzi,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Open Government Data Research: Challenges, Opportunities and Gaps , 2018, 2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI).

[64]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users , 2017, Inf. Polity.

[65]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customers Adopt Technology (Маркетинг технологий: как и почему Ваши потребители принимают технологии) , 2001 .

[66]  Hugh Glaser,et al.  Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[67]  Silvana Trimi,et al.  The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption , 2013 .

[68]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The Diffusion of ICT for Corruption Detection in Open Government Data , 2019, Knowl. Eng. Data Sci..

[69]  Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani,et al.  Web-based e-Government services acceptance for G2C: A structural equation modelling approach. , 2011 .

[70]  Eldon Y. Li Perceived importance of information system success factors: A meta analysis of group differences , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[71]  N. Huijboom,et al.  Open data: An International comparison of strategies , 2011 .

[72]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function , 1994 .

[73]  Gwang Yong Gim,et al.  A Study on Public Open Data Service Using Linked Open Data(LOD) Technology , 2018 .

[74]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa A Lightweight Approach to Semantify Saudi Open Government Data , 2013, 2013 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems.

[75]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Open government and citizen participation: an empirical analysis of citizen expectancy towards open government data , 2019 .

[76]  Yury Kabanov,et al.  Politics of Open Data in Russia: Regional and Municipal Perspectives , 2017 .

[77]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data , 2018 .

[78]  Catarina Roseira,et al.  Exploring the Barriers in the Commercial Use of Open Government Data , 2016, ICEGOV.

[79]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  An International Survey of the Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Open Government , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[80]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[81]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[82]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa,et al.  A proposed checklist for the technical maturity of open government data: an application on GCC countries , 2016, iiWAS.

[83]  Tim Davies,et al.  The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons , 2019 .

[84]  Chinyao Low,et al.  Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[85]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[86]  Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado,et al.  Knowledge areas, themes and future research on open data: A co-word analysis , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[87]  Stuti Saxena,et al.  Drivers and barriers towards re-using open government data (OGD): a case study of open data initiative in Oman , 2018 .

[88]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[89]  Chang-Shuo Lin,et al.  Organizational, Technological, and Environmental Determinants of Electronic Commerce Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan , 2006 .

[90]  Sylvain Kubler,et al.  Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[91]  Noor Zalina Zainal,et al.  A Trust-Based Conceptual Framework on Open Government Data Potential Use , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M).