Learning in the Digital Age with SNSs: Creating a Profile

In the proposed chapter, we will start off by introducing social media and some of the features of social networking sites. We will go on to highlight why these technologies are so pervasive, and how/why people are using them. We will expand our discussion to include studies that have examined Facebook as a social networking and learning tool. Specifically, we will go on to present studies that relate to the integration of technology and social media as a means for encouraging learning across the life span, and will use social learning as a theoretical base. We will also present how social media such as Facebook can enrich learning, and offer some suggestions and insights into the policies that may help to balance security, privacy, and risk issues associated with using social media in education. Next, we will present information about risks associated with using social media, and will continue by highlighting how users can protect their information online. We will then present some potential privacy and policy considerations within the educational context that examine social learning contexts, and the implications that these contexts have for the learner and educator. Lastly, we will conclude by offering some suggestions about how to best integrate this technology within the classroom.

[1]  Eileen Wood,et al.  All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Edward J. Maloney What Web 2.0 Can Teach Us about Learning. , 2007 .

[3]  Alissa N. Anderson Implementing Technology in the Classroom: Assessing Teachers’ Needs Through the Use of a Just-In-Time Support System , 2009 .

[4]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[8]  N. Selwyn Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook , 2009 .

[9]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[10]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Children's Learning in a Digital World , 2007 .

[11]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[12]  D. Olson,et al.  The Handbook of education and human development : new models of learning, teaching, and schooling , 1996 .

[13]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Gail Crombie,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and Context , 2003 .

[15]  A. Arendt Social Media Tools and the Policies Associated with Them , 2009 .

[16]  S. Ziegler,et al.  The (mis)education of Generation M , 2007 .

[17]  S. E. Aduwa-Ogiegbaen Nigerian Inservice Teachers’ Self-Assessment in Core Technology Competences and Their Professional Development Needs in ICT , 2009 .

[18]  Myra Sadker,et al.  Failing at fairness : how America's schools cheat girls , 1995 .

[19]  Ulises Mejías,et al.  A Nomad’s Guide to Learning and Social Software , 2005 .

[20]  Kelly S. Shapley,et al.  Effects of Technology Immersion on Teachers' Growth in Technology Competency, Ideology, and Practices , 2010 .

[21]  V. Savicki,et al.  Gender, Group Composition, and Task Type in Small Task Groups Using Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[22]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[24]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Stephen J. Bostock *,et al.  Gender in student online discussions , 2005 .

[26]  S. Patrick GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE ONLINE CLASSROOM: MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE STUDENTS EVALUATE THEIR EXPERIENCES , 2001 .

[27]  A. Bandura Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[28]  Yasemin Koçak Usluel,et al.  Modeling educational usage of Facebook , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  G. Watson Technology Professional Development: Long-Term Effects on Teacher Self-Efficacy , 2006 .

[30]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users' Attitudes About Online Privacy , 1999, ArXiv.

[31]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[32]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[34]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social networking websites and teens: an overview , 2007 .

[35]  Herman T. Tavani Ethics and technology - ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology (2. ed.) , 2007 .

[36]  Androniki Kavoura,et al.  Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature on Harassment Through the Internet and Other Electronic Means , 2010, Family & community health.

[37]  K. Stanovich What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought , 2009 .

[38]  Fotini Paraskeva,et al.  Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[40]  Peter Albion,et al.  Web 2.0 in Teacher Education: Two Imperatives for Action , 2008 .

[41]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Connecting Informal and Formal Learning Experiences in the Age of Participatory Media , 2008 .

[42]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[43]  A. Birch,et al.  Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model , 2009 .

[44]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[45]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet , 2005 .

[46]  Michael J. Bugeja Facing the Facebook. , 2006 .

[47]  Heather Lotherington,et al.  Factors contributing to teachers' successful implementation of IT , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[48]  Gerald D. Bailey,et al.  Digital Citizenship: Addressing Appropriate Technology Behavior. , 2004 .

[49]  R. Mason Learning technologies for adult continuing education , 2006 .

[50]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  The effects of teacher self‐disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility , 2009 .

[51]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[52]  R. Kraut,et al.  Using E-mail for Personal Relationships , 2001 .

[53]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  Managing Teachers’ Barriers to ICT Integration in Singapore Schools , 2006 .