Image-based teleconsultation using smartphones or tablets: qualitative assessment of medical experts

Background Mobile health has promising potential in improving healthcare delivery by facilitating access to expert advice. Enabling experts to review images on their smartphone or tablet may save valuable time. This study aims at assessing whether images viewed by medical specialists on handheld devices such as smartphones and tablets are perceived to be of comparable quality as when viewed on a computer screen. Methods This was a prospective study comparing the perceived quality of 18 images on three different display devices (smartphone, tablet and computer) by 27 participants (4 burn surgeons and 23 emergency medicine specialists). The images, presented in random order, covered clinical (dermatological conditions, burns, ECGs and X-rays) and non-clinical subjects and their perceived quality was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale. Differences in devices' quality ratings were analysed using linear regression models for clustered data adjusting for image type and participants’ characteristics (age, gender and medical specialty). Results Overall, the images were rated good or very good in most instances and more so for the smartphone (83.1%, mean score 5.7) and tablet (78.2%, mean 5.5) than for a standard computer (70.6%, mean 5.2). Both handheld devices had significantly higher ratings than the computer screen, even after controlling for image type and participants' characteristics. Nearly all experts expressed that they would be comfortable using smartphones (n=25) or tablets (n=26) for image-based teleconsultation. Conclusion This study suggests that handheld devices could be a substitute for computer screens for teleconsultation by physicians working in emergency settings.

[1]  K. Wiklund,et al.  Mobile teledermatology is a valid method to estimate prevalence of melanocytic naevi in children. , 2015, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[2]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Image Quality Characteristics of Handheld Display Devices for Medical Imaging , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  C. Tracy,et al.  Interpretation of remotely downloaded pocket-size cardiac ultrasound images on a web-enabled smartphone: validation against workstation evaluation. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  J. Ryan,et al.  Is the iPad suitable for image display at American Board of Radiology examinations? , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Feroze Kaliyadan,et al.  Clinical photography in dermatology using smartphones: An overview , 2015, Indian Dermatology Online Journal.

[6]  D. Torigian,et al.  The accuracy of mobile teleradiology in the evaluation of chest X-rays , 2014, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  L. Laflamme,et al.  Photograph-based diagnosis of burns in patients with dark-skin types: the importance of case and assessor characteristics. , 2015, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[8]  C. FitzGerald,et al.  DOCSS: doctors on-call smartphone study , 2014, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[9]  E. McMeniman,et al.  Clinical photography in dermatology: Ethical and medico‐legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology , 2013, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[10]  Harry W Severance,et al.  Smartphone ECG for evaluation of STEMI: results of the ST LEUIS Pilot Study. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  N. Al-Hadithy,et al.  Smartphones and the plastic surgeon. , 2013, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[12]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of teledermatoscopy with images taken by general practitioners during everyday practice , 2013, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[13]  Woojin Kim,et al.  Use of mobile devices for medical imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  W. Gunther CLINICAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN DERMATOLOGY , 1953, Australian journal of dermatology.

[15]  Lucie Laflamme,et al.  Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  Robi N. Maamari,et al.  A mobile phone-based retinal camera for portable wide field imaging , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Foran,et al.  mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2013, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[18]  L. Caffery,et al.  Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.