Understanding the consumer: Multi-modal market research on consumer attitudes in Germany towards lightweight furniture and lightweight materials in furniture design

The market study presented in this paper examines consumer attitudes in Germany toward lightweight furniture and the use of lightweight wood-based materials in furniture design. The multi-modal technique employed in the study is based on quantitative and qualitative methodologies used in social and economic research. A representative survey of furniture customers was conducted (n = 1,000), and the study included conjoint analysis. The survey was supplemented by expert interviews with furniture sales staff, focus group and observation of customers when they purchase furniture. The weight of furniture made primarily of wood-based materials is of secondary importance from the consumer perspective (in contrast to more relevant factors such as quality, price and design). The results of conjoint analysis reveal that for the attribute “weight” lightweight furniture materials are considered to be of at least comparable value. However, lightweight furniture is only accepted or preferred as long as there is no explicit indication that the product is lightweight furniture or features lightweight design. The majority of customers are skeptical whether furniture made of lightweight materials has the same quality as furniture made of heavy materials. Because furniture weight is less relevant to consumers, there is no indication of a need pull effect (consumer-driven) for lightweight furniture at the present time or in the near future. On the other hand, consumers can be expected to have few reservations if more lightweight furniture is placed on the market in the future. So consumers are unlikely to resist a technology push on the part of furniture manufacturers.

[1]  Witold-Roger Poganietz,et al.  The utilization of light weight boards for reducing air emissions by the German wood industry – a perspective? , 2013, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[2]  Frank Huber,et al.  Conjoint Measurement - Methods and Applications (4:th ed) , 2007 .

[3]  William H. Bolen,et al.  Why We Buy the Science of Shopping , 2000 .

[4]  Paco Underhill,et al.  Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping , 1999 .

[5]  H. Thoemen,et al.  Comparison of foam core materials in innovative lightweight wood-based panels , 2011, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[7]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[8]  T. Öberg,et al.  Conjoint analysis , 2008, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[9]  R. Fisher,et al.  Social-Desirability Bias and the Validity of Self-Reported Values , 2000 .

[10]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft , 2012 .

[11]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[12]  Dora Marinova,et al.  Models of Innovation , 2003 .

[13]  J. Oktay Grounded Theory , 2012 .

[14]  Larisa V. Shavinina The international handbook on innovation , 2003 .

[15]  Paco Underhill,et al.  Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping--Updated and Revised for the Internet, the Global Consumer, and Beyond , 2008 .

[16]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications , 2000 .