Use of an integrated flow model to estimate ecologically relevant hydrologic characteristics at stream biomonitoring sites

Abstract We developed an integrated hydroecological model to provide a comprehensive set of hydrologic variables representing five major components of the flow regime at 856 aquatic-invertebrate monitoring sites in New Jersey. The hydroecological model simulates streamflow by routing water that moves overland and through the subsurface from atmospheric delivery to the watershed outlet. Snow accumulation and melt, evapotranspiration, precipitation, withdrawals, discharges, pervious- and impervious-area runoff, and lake storage were accounted for in the water balance. We generated more than 78 flow variables, which describe the frequency, magnitude, duration, rate of change, and timing of flow events. Highly correlated variables were filtered by principal component analysis to obtain a non-redundant subset of variables that explain the majority of the variation in the complete set. This subset of variables was used to evaluate the effect of changes in the flow regime on aquatic-invertebrate assemblage structure at 856 biomonitoring sites. We used non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS) to evaluate variation in aquatic-invertebrate assemblage structure across a disturbance gradient. We employed multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis to build a series of MLR models that identify the most important environmental and hydrologic variables driving the differences in the aquatic-invertebrate assemblages across the disturbance gradient. The first axis of NMS ordination was significantly related to many hydrologic, habitat, and land-use/land-cover variables, including the average number of annual storms producing runoff, ratio of 25–75% exceedance flow (flashiness), diversity of natural stream substrate, and the percentage of forested land near the stream channel (forest buffer). Modifications in the hydrologic regime as the result of changes in watershed land use appear to promote the retention of highly tolerant aquatic species; in contrast, species that are sensitive to hydrologic instability and other anthropogenic disturbance become much less prevalent. We also found strong relations between an index of invertebrate-assemblage impairment, its component metrics, and the primary disturbance gradient. The process-oriented watershed modeling approach used in this study provides a means to evaluate how natural landscape features interact with anthropogenic factors and assess their effects on flow characteristics and stream ecology. By combining watershed modeling and indirect ordination techniques, we were able to identify components of the hydrologic regime that have a considerable effect on aquatic-assemblage structure and help in developing short- and long-term management measures that mitigate the effects of anthropogenic disturbance in stream systems.

[1]  J. Kennen,et al.  Effects of landscape change on fish assemblage structure in a rapidly growing metropolitan area in North Carolina, USA , 2005 .

[2]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[3]  Stochastic calibration of an orographic precipitation model , 1998 .

[4]  T. Casadevall,et al.  Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow records-update , 1993 .

[5]  David M. Wolock,et al.  SIMULATING THE VARIABLE-SOURCE-AREA CONCEPT OF STREAMFLOW GENERATION WITH THE WATERSHED MODEL TOPMODEL , 1993 .

[6]  Helmut Elsenbeer,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Soil Hydraulic Conductivity in a Tropical Rain Forest Catchment , 1992 .

[7]  M. A. Ayers,et al.  Water quality in the Long Island-New Jersey coastal drainages, New York and New Jersey, 1996-98 , 2000 .

[8]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[9]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[10]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[11]  Tim Burt,et al.  Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions , 1985 .

[12]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[13]  R. T. Roberts,et al.  Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR-55 Rev.) , 1985 .

[14]  A. G. Bobba,et al.  Application of environmental models to different hydrological systems , 2000 .

[15]  B. Biggs,et al.  Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams , 1997 .

[16]  M. Brusven,et al.  Effects of sedimentation on the behavior and distribution of riffle insects in a laboratory stream 1 , 1980 .

[17]  Richard A. Smith,et al.  A spatial model to aggregate point-source and nonpoint-source water-quality data for large areas , 1992 .

[18]  A. Morin,et al.  Relationships between Size Structure of Invertebrate Assemblages and Trophy and Substrate Composition in Streams , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  L. Brown Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems , 2005 .

[20]  C. F. Rabeni,et al.  Biomonitoring for deposited sediment using benthic invertebrates: a test on 4 Missouri streams , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[21]  W. Russell Hamon Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration , 1960 .

[22]  M. Freeman,et al.  Geomorphology and fish assemblages in a Piedmont river basin, U.S.A , 2003 .

[23]  D. Yogi Goswami,et al.  Principles of Solar Engineering , 1978 .

[24]  R. A. Zampella,et al.  Effect of watershed disturbance on Pinelands stream vegetation1 , 1997 .

[25]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[26]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  GIS and distributed hydrological models , 1993 .

[28]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[29]  M. Freeman,et al.  Fish Assemblage Responses to Water Withdrawals and Water Supply Reservoirs in Piedmont Streams , 2006, Environmental management.

[30]  K. Beven Infiltration into a class of vertically non-uniform soils , 1984 .

[31]  R. Spear Eutrophication in peel inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis , 1980 .

[32]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  The Ecology of Aquatic Insects , 1984 .

[33]  G. Host,et al.  Examining Land Use Influences on Stream Habitats and Macroinvertebrates , 1994 .

[34]  Peter R. Minchin,et al.  An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination , 1987 .

[35]  R. Jones,et al.  IMPACT OF WATERSHED URBANIZATION ON STREAM INSECT COMMUNITIES , 1987 .

[36]  Pascal Perez,et al.  A Biophysical Toolbox for assessment and management of land and water resources in rural catchments in Northern Thailand , 2004 .

[37]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[38]  J. Meyer,et al.  Flow regime alterations under changing climate in two river basins: implications for freshwater ecosystems , 2005 .

[39]  Brian P. Bledsoe,et al.  Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streamsin Colorado, Washington, and Oregon , 2006 .

[40]  J. Hewlett Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[41]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[42]  A. N. Strahler Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[43]  K. Beven,et al.  Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts:Topographic indices of hydrological similarity , 1996 .

[44]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[45]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  THROUGHFLOW, OVERLAND FLOW AND EROSION , 1967 .

[46]  H. Garie,et al.  DISTRIBUTION OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN A STREAM EXPOSED TO URBAN RUNOFF , 1986 .

[47]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[48]  P. G. N. Digby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities , 1987 .

[49]  Paul M. Mather Computational Methods of Multivariate Analysis in Physical Geography , 1976 .

[50]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Riparian vegetation and channel morphology impact on spatial patterns of water quality in agricultural watersheds , 1981 .

[51]  Marla H. Stuckey Low-flow, base-flow, and mean-flow regression equations for Pennsylvania streams , 2006 .

[52]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[53]  Jonathan G. Kennen,et al.  RELATION OF MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY IMPAIRMENT TO CATCHMENT CHARACTERISTICS IN NEW JERSEY STREAMS 1 , 1999 .

[54]  David S. Leigh,et al.  Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.) , 2003 .

[55]  L. Lesack,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of light attenuation among lakes of the Mackenzie Delta , 2003 .

[56]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[57]  M. Williams,et al.  Forest canopy hydraulic properties and catchment water balance: observations and modeling , 2002 .

[58]  R. A. Zampella CHARACTERIZATION OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY ALONG A WATERSHED DISTURBANCE GRADIENT , 1994 .

[59]  M. A. Ayers,et al.  Effects of land use and travel time on the distribution of nitrate in the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer system in southern New Jersey , 2001 .

[60]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[61]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota , 1996 .

[62]  M. A. Ayers,et al.  Relation of Environmental characteristics to the composition of aquatic assemblages along a gradient of urban land use in New Jersey, 1996-98 , 2002 .

[63]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[64]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[65]  K. Beven,et al.  The hydrological response of headwater and sideslope areas / La réponse hydrologique des zones de cours supérieurs et des zones de pente latérale , 1978 .

[66]  Donald A. Jackson STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[67]  Kenneth W. Eagleson,et al.  Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos , 1981, Hydrobiologia.

[68]  F. M. Chutter,et al.  The effects of silt and sand on the invertebrate fauna of streams and rivers , 1969, Hydrobiologia.

[69]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[70]  B. Manly Multivariate Statistical Methods : A Primer , 1986 .

[71]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[72]  P. Armitage,et al.  Biological Effects of Fine Sediment in the Lotic Environment , 1997, Environmental management.

[73]  Ton H. Snelder,et al.  Improved eco‐hydrological classification of rivers , 2005 .

[74]  A. K. O'brien PRESENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN NEW JERSEY STREAMBED SEDIMENTS 1 , 1997 .

[75]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[76]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Geographical Information Handling - Research and Applications , 1994 .

[77]  K. Bencala,et al.  Overview of a simple model describing variation of dissolved organic carbon in an upland catchment , 1996 .

[78]  N. Poff,et al.  A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale‐dependence in some hydrological descriptors , 1996 .

[79]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[80]  Keith Beven,et al.  TOPMODEL as an application module within WIS , 1993 .

[81]  A. Arthington,et al.  Discharge variability and the development of predictive models relating stream fish assemblage structure to habitat in northeastern Australia , 2000 .

[82]  Melissa Parsons,et al.  Identifying spatial and temporal patterns in the hydrological character of the Condamine–Balonne river, Australia, using multivariate statistics , 2003 .

[83]  J. Hewlett,et al.  Predicting and Mapping the Average Hydrologic Response for the Eastern United States , 1970 .

[84]  R. A. Zampella,et al.  USE OF REFERENCE-SITE FISH ASSEMBLAGES TO ASSESS AQUATIC DEGRADATION IN PINELANDS STREAMS , 1998 .

[85]  K. Beven,et al.  On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: The incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process , 1998 .

[86]  W. Hilsenhoff Rapid Field Assessment of Organic Pollution with a Family-Level Biotic Index , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[87]  P. Stackelberg PRESENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHLORINATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN STREAMBED SEDIMENTS, NEW JERSEY 1 , 1997 .

[88]  G. Ampt,et al.  Studies on Soil Physics: Part II — The Permeability of an Ideal Soil to Air and Water , 1912, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[89]  Véronique Beaujouan,et al.  Modelling the effect of the spatial distribution of agricultural practices on nitrogen fluxes in rural catchments , 2001 .