Is Small for Gestational Age a Marker of Future Fetal Survival In Utero?

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether small for gestational age is a risk factor for stillbirth of a subsequent sibling. METHODS: The Missouri maternally linked cohort data set, containing data on births from 1978 through 1997, was used. We identified the study group (women who delivered a SGA infant in the first pregnancy) and a comparison group (women who delivered a non-SGA infant in their first pregnancy) and compared the outcome (stillbirth) in the second pregnancy between both groups. RESULTS: We analyzed information on the first and second pregnancies of 402,015 women (43,549 [10.8%] in the study arm and 358,466 [89.2%] in the comparison arm). Of the 1,883 cases of stillbirth in the second pregnancy, 314 cases occurred in mothers with a history of SGA (stillbirth rate 7.2/1,000) and 1,569 in the comparison group (stillbirth rate 4.4/1,000), P < .001. The adjusted risk of stillbirth was 60% higher in women with a prior SGA (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–1.8). The risk for stillbirth in the second pregnancy increased with decreasing gestational age at birth of the SGA infant in the first pregnancy (term: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.6; preterm: OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0–3.8; and very preterm: OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4–7.3), P for trend < .001. CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age is a marker for subsequent stillbirth, and the risk rises with decreasing gestational age of the SGA birth. This information is potentially useful for counseling parents of SGA infants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2

[1]  R. Seupaul,et al.  Prevalence of postdural puncture headache after ED performed lumbar puncture. , 2005, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[2]  R. Kirby,et al.  Racial Disparity in Stillbirth Among Singleton, Twin, and Triplet Gestations in the United States , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Previous preterm and small-for-gestational-age births and the subsequent risk of stillbirth. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population‐based birthweight standards , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  K. Flegal,et al.  Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  P. Danielian,et al.  Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in antepartum stillbirths , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Analysis of birthweight and gestational age in anteparturn stillbirths , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  J. Martin,et al.  What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? , 1998, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  M. Kotelchuck,et al.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices. , 1996, Public health reports.

[10]  J. Golding,et al.  Past obstetric history and risk of perinatal death in Jamaica. , 1994, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[11]  R. W. Huff,et al.  Recurrent stillbirth. Significance and characteristics. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[12]  T. Bennett,et al.  Marital status and infant health outcomes. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[13]  G. Alexander,et al.  Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. , 1987, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  B. Mueller,et al.  Data linkage methods used in maternally-linked birth and infant death surveillance data sets from the United States (Georgia, Missouri, Utah and Washington State), Israel, Norway, Scotland and Western Australia. , 1997, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.