Observations and comments on the reliability of muscle reconstruction in fossil vertebrates

In Canis and Ursus the largest proportion of attachments of muscles of the shoulder and brachium on the scapula and humerus is direct; fewer attachments are aponeurotic or tendinous. In both genera most attachments can be associated with superficial osteological features (scars or delimitable surfaces); attachments that lack such features are direct. Most aponeurotic attachments are associated with rugose scarring whereas tendinous attachments are often associated with smooth surfaces. Although most attachments can be associated with osteological features the areal extent of attachment is often not inferrable from the bone. The inference of muscle size or functional significance from osteological features is problematic. The amount of myological information that can be deciphered from the osteology in Canis and Ursus is greater than that reported for particular members of other vertebrate groups which suggests that there may be differences in the degree to which muscles can be reconstructed from superficial osteology alone. Nonetheless, even in mammals such as the Carnivora, detailed muscular reconstructions in extinct taxa cannot be achieved without reference to the musculature of extant relatives. Such reconstructions rely on assumptions, that often have not been adequately tested, regarding the similarity of musculature in closely related taxa. This testing and well corroborated hypotheses of phylogenetic relationship are essential for the evaluation of the accuracy of reconstructions of the musculature in fossil vertebrates.

[1]  Thomas Kemp Haemothermia or Archosauria? The interrelationships of mammals, birds and crocodiles , 1988 .

[2]  A. Romer THE PELVIC MUSCULATURE OF ORNITHISCHIAN DINOSAURS , 1927 .

[3]  Peter Ax,et al.  The phylogenetic system : the systematization of organisms on the basis of their phylogenesis , 1987 .

[4]  C. Mcgowan The wing musculature of the Brown kiwi Apteryx australis mantelli and its bearing on ratite affinities , 1982 .

[5]  D. Russell A Pterosaur from the Oldman Formation (Cretaceous) of Alberta , 1972 .

[6]  T. Frazzetta Adaptive problems and possibilities in the temporal fenestration of tetrapod skulls , 1968, Journal of morphology.

[7]  H. Evans,et al.  Anatomy of the dog , 1964 .

[8]  C. Gans Fiber architecture and muscle function. , 1982, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  Q. Wheeler,et al.  The Out-Group Comparison Method of Character Analysis , 1981 .

[10]  C. Mcgowan The hind limb musculature of the brown kiwi, Apteryx australis mantelli , 1979, Journal of morphology.

[11]  K. Rose Climbing adaptations in the early eocene mammal Chriacus and the origin of artiodactyla. , 1987, Science.

[12]  V. J. Maglio Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae , 1973 .

[13]  A. Wyss,et al.  Skeleton of the Oldest Known Pinniped, Enaliarctos mealsi , 1989, Science.

[14]  D. Russell Ostrich Dinosaurs from the Late Cretaceous of Western Canada , 1972 .

[15]  C. Gans,et al.  Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle , 1987, Journal of morphology.

[16]  A. Russell,et al.  Structure and function of the pectoral girdle and forelimb of Struthiomimus altus (Theropoda: Ornithomimidae) , 1985 .

[17]  R. Holmes The osteology and musculature of the pectoral limb of small captorhinids , 1977, Journal of morphology.

[18]  P. Galton,et al.  The pelvic musucJature of the dinosaur Hypsilophodon (Reptilia: Ornithischia) , 1969 .

[19]  D H ELLIOTT,et al.  STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF MAMMALIAN TENDON , 1965, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  S. Sumida The appendicular skeleton of the Early Permian genus Labidosaurus (Reptilia, Captorhinomorpha, Captorhinidae) and the hind limb musculature of captorhinid reptiles , 1989 .

[21]  A. Boyde CHAPTER 8 – Scanning Electron Microscope Studies of Bone , 1972 .