Demons versus level-set motion registration for coronary 18F-sodium fluoride PET

Ruptured coronary atherosclerotic plaques commonly cause acute myocardial infarction. It has been recently shown that active microcalcification in the coronary arteries, one of the features that characterizes vulnerable plaques at risk of rupture, can be imaged using cardiac gated 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET. We have shown in previous work that a motion correction technique applied to cardiac-gated 18F-NaF PET images can enhance image quality and improve uptake estimates. In this study, we further investigated the applicability of different algorithms for registration of the coronary artery PET images. In particular, we aimed to compare demons vs. level-set nonlinear registration techniques applied for the correction of cardiac motion in coronary 18F-NaF PET. To this end, fifteen patients underwent 18F-NaF PET and prospective coronary CT angiography (CCTA). PET data were reconstructed in 10 ECG gated bins; subsequently these gated bins were registered using demons and level-set methods guided by the extracted coronary arteries from CCTA, to eliminate the effect of cardiac motion on PET images. Noise levels, target-to-background ratios (TBR) and global motion were compared to assess image quality. Compared to the reference standard of using only diastolic PET image (25% of the counts from PET acquisition), cardiac motion registration using either level-set or demons techniques almost halved image noise due to the use of counts from the full PET acquisition and increased TBR difference between 18F-NaF positive and negative lesions. The demons method produces smoother deformation fields, exhibiting no singularities (which reflects how physically plausible the registration deformation is), as compared to the level-set method, which presents between 4 and 8% of singularities, depending on the coronary artery considered. In conclusion, the demons method produces smoother motion fields as compared to the level-set method, with a motion that is physiologically plausible. Therefore, level-set technique will likely require additional post-processing steps. On the other hand, the observed TBR increases were the highest for the level-set technique. Further investigations of the optimal registration technique of this novel coronary PET imaging technique are warranted.

[1]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2008, 11th International Conference, New York, NY, USA, September 6-10, 2008, Proceedings, Part I , 2008, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[2]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Evolving Processes in 3D Medical Images: Application to Multiple Sclerosis , 1999, IPMI.

[3]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[4]  D. Dey,et al.  Comparison of quantitative atherosclerotic plaque burden from coronary CT angiography in patients with first acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease. , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Evolving Processes in 3D Medical Images: Application to Multiple Sclerosis , 1999, IPMI.

[6]  Damini Dey,et al.  Motion Correction of 18F-NaF PET for Imaging Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Interscan reproducibility of quantitative coronary plaque volume and composition from CT coronary angiography using an automated method , 2013, European Radiology.

[8]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[9]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Motion Correction in Dual Gated Cardiac PET Using Mass-Preserving Image Registration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2009 , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[11]  Jeremy N. Skepper,et al.  Identifying active vascular microcalcification by 18 F-sodium fluoride positron emission , 2015 .

[12]  M. Dweck,et al.  18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[13]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated Quantitative Plaque Burden from Coronary CT Angiography Noninvasively Predicts Hemodynamic Significance by using Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions. , 2015, Radiology.

[15]  Y. Chen,et al.  Image registration via level-set motion: Applications to atlas-based segmentation , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Evaluation of respiratory and cardiac motion correction schemes in dual gated PET/CT cardiac imaging. , 2014, Medical physics.

[17]  Elliot R. McVeigh,et al.  Displacement and velocity of the coronary arteries: cardiac and respiratory motion , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[19]  Michael Casey,et al.  Elastic motion correction for cardiac PET studies , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).