Long-term structural canopy changes sustain net photosynthesis per ground area in high arctic Vaccinium uliginosum exposed to changes in near-ambient UV-B levels.

Full recovery of the ozone layer is not expected for several decades and consequently, the incoming level of solar ultraviolet-B (UV-B) will only slowly be reduced. Therefore to investigate the structural and photosynthetic responses to changes in solar UV-B we conducted a 5-year UV-B exclusion study in high arctic Greenland. During the growing season, the gas exchange (H₂O and CO₂) and chlorophyll-a fluorescence were measured in Vaccinium uliginosum. The leaf dry weight, carbon, nitrogen, stable carbon isotope ratio, chlorophyll and carotenoid content were determined from a late season harvest. The net photosynthesis per leaf area was on average 22% higher in 61% reduced UV-B treatment across the season, but per ground area photosynthesis was unchanged. The leaf level increase in photosynthesis was accompanied by increased leaf nitrogen, higher stomatal conductance and F(v)/F(m). There was no change in total leaf biomass, but reduction in total leaf area caused a pronounced reduction of specific leaf area and leaf area index in reduced UV-B. This demonstrates the structural changes to counterbalance the reduced plant carbon uptake seen per leaf area in ambient UV-B as the resulting plant carbon uptake per ground area was not affected. Thus, our understanding of long-term responses to UV-B reduction must take into account both leaf level processes as well as structural changes to understand the apparent robustness of plant carbon uptake per ground area. In this perspective, V. uliginosum seems able to adjust plant carbon uptake to the present amount of solar UV-B radiation in the High Arctic.

[1]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Ambient UV-B radiation reduces PSII performance and net photosynthesis in high Arctic Salix arctica , 2011 .

[2]  S. Flint,et al.  Effects of solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems. Patterns, mechanisms, and interactions with climate change , 2011, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[3]  S. Saarnio,et al.  Long-term effects of elevated UV-B radiation on photosynthesis and ultrastructure of Eriophorum russeolum and Warnstorfia exannulata. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Improved UV-B screening capacity does not prevent negative effects of ambient UV irradiance on PSII performance in High Arctic plants. Results from a six year UV exclusion study. , 2010, Journal of plant physiology.

[5]  S. Peng,et al.  A meta-analysis of the responses of woody and herbaceous plants to elevated ultraviolet-B radiation , 2010 .

[6]  Sharon A. Robinson,et al.  Responses of plants in polar regions to UVB exposure: a meta‐analysis , 2009 .

[7]  W. Knorr,et al.  Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global‐scale terrestrial biosphere models , 2009 .

[8]  M. Rasch,et al.  Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations, 14th Annual Report, 2008 , 2009 .

[9]  K. R. Albert,et al.  Ambient UV-B radiation decreases photosynthesis in high arctic Vaccinium uliginosum. , 2008, Physiologia plantarum.

[10]  B. Elberling,et al.  Soil and Plant Community Characteristics and Dynamics at Zackenberg , 2008 .

[11]  K. Winter,et al.  Photoprotection, photosynthesis and growth of tropical tree seedlings under near-ambient and strongly reduced solar ultraviolet-B radiation. , 2007, Journal of plant physiology.

[12]  C. T. Ruhland,et al.  Solar ultraviolet-B radiation increases phenolic content and ferric reducing antioxidant power in Avena sativa. , 2007, Molecules.

[13]  J. Rozema,et al.  Depletion of stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic and Arctic: responses of plants of polar terrestrial ecosystems to enhanced UV-B, an overview. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[14]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Ambient ultraviolet radiation in the Arctic reduces root biomass and alters microbial community composition but has no effects on microbial biomass , 2005 .

[15]  Acia Arctic Climate Impact Assessment - ACIA , 2005 .

[16]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Arctic tundra and Polar Desert Ecosystems , 2005 .

[17]  L. Björn,et al.  Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: High Arctic Tundra Plant Growth on Svalbard is not Affected by Enhanced UV-B after 7 years of UV-B Supplementation in the Field , 2005, Plant Ecology.

[18]  Teis N. Mikkelsen,et al.  Reduction of the Ambient UV-B Radiation in the High-Arctic Increases Fv/Fm in Salix arctica and Vaccinium uliginosum and Reduces Stomatal Conductance and Internal CO2 Concentration in Salix arctica , 2004 .

[19]  William T. Peterjohn,et al.  Effects of ambient UV-B radiation on the above-ground biomass of seven temperate-zone plant species , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[20]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Ecological importance of ambient solar ultraviolet radiation to a sub-arctic heath community , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[21]  S. Flint,et al.  Ecosystem UV-B experiments in terrestrial communities: a review of recent findings and methodologies , 2003 .

[22]  P. Aphalo Do current levels of UV-B radiation affect vegetation? The importance of long-term experiments. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[23]  S. Flint,et al.  Six years of solar UV-B manipulations affect growth of Sphagnum and vascular plants in a Tierra del Fuego peatland. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[24]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Contrasting strategies for UV-B screening in sub-Arctic dwarf shrubs. , 2003, Plant, cell & environment.

[25]  L. Björn,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystems, increased solar ultraviolet radiation and interactions with other climatic change factors. , 2003, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[26]  F. Xiong,et al.  Effect of springtime solar ultraviolet‐B radiation on growth of Colobanthus quitensis at Palmer Station, Antarctica , 2002 .

[27]  C. Dormann,et al.  Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta‐analysis of field experiments , 2002 .

[28]  F. Xiong,et al.  Influence of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on Antarctic terrestrial plants: results from a 4-year field study. , 2001, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[29]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Impacts of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on terrestrial ecosystems of Tierra del Fuego (southern Argentina). An overview of recent progress. , 2001, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[30]  Nigel D. Paul,et al.  Plant responses to UV‐B: time to look beyond stratospheric ozone depletion? , 2001 .

[31]  Why don’t mosses flower? , 2001 .

[32]  F. Xiong,et al.  Effect of solar ultraviolet-B radiation during springtime ozone depletion on photosynthesis and biomass production of Antarctic vascular plants. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[33]  T. Day,et al.  Effects of ultraviolet‐B radiation on leaf elongation, production and phenylpropanoid concentrations of Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis in Antarctica , 2000 .

[34]  L. Björn,et al.  Effects of ozone depletion and increased ultraviolet‐B radiation on northern vegetation , 1999 .

[35]  A. Webb Plants and UV-B: Monitoring changes in UV-B radiation , 1997 .

[36]  Nigel D. Paul,et al.  Responses to ultraviolet-B radiation (280-315 nm) of pea (Pisum sativum) lines differing in leaf surface wax , 1996 .

[37]  L. Björn,et al.  The Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation on the Growth of Dwarf Shrubs in a Subarctic Heathland , 1995 .

[38]  L. Björn,et al.  The effects of an enhanced UV-B radiation on a sub-arctic heath ecosystem , 1995 .

[39]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[40]  J. Farman,et al.  Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction , 1985, Nature.

[41]  A. Wellburn,et al.  Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents , 1983 .