Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date.

PURPOSE To describe baseline and longitudinal findings of the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. METHODS The CLEK Study is an 8-year, multi-center, natural history study of 1209 patients with keratoconus who were examined annually for 8 years. Its goals are to prospectively characterize changes in vision, corneal curvature, corneal status, and vision-specific quality of life. RESULTS CLEK Study subjects had a mean age at baseline of 39.3+/-10.9 years. At study entry, 65% of the patients wore rigid contact lenses, and 14% reported a family history of the disease. Subjects exhibited a 7-year decrease in high- (2.03 letters) and low- (4.06 letters) contrast, best-corrected visual acuity, with 19% demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in high-contrast, best-corrected acuity and 31% of subjects demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in low-contrast, best-corrected acuity in at least one eye. Subjects exhibited an average 8-year increase in corneal curvature of 1.60D in the flat corneal meridian, with 24% demonstrating increases of 3.00D or more. The 8-year incidence of corneal scarring was 20%, with younger age, corneal staining, steeper baseline corneal curvature, contact lens wear, and poorer low-contrast visual acuity predictive of corneal scarring. Data from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire suggest that the effect of keratoconus on vision-specific quality of life is disproportionate to its low prevalence and clinical severity. CONCLUSION Although we report measures of disease severity and visual function across the CLEK sample, clinicians can begin to envisage the course of keratoconus in individual patients by determining whether factors predictive of disease progression are present in those patients.

[1]  M. Gordon,et al.  Estimation of the incidence and factors predictive of corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. , 2006, Cornea.

[2]  M. Gordon,et al.  Rigid contact lens fitting relationships in keratoconus , 1999 .

[3]  M. Gordon,et al.  Quality of life in keratoconus. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  D. Korb,et al.  Apical changes and scarring in keratoconus as related to contact lens fitting techniques. , 1982, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[5]  M. Gordon,et al.  Repeatability and Agreement of Two Corneal‐Curvature Assessments in Keratoconus: Keratometry and the First Definite Apical Clearance Lens (FDACL) , 1998, Cornea.

[6]  T W Raasch,et al.  Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  M. Gordon,et al.  Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. , 2001 .

[8]  M. Gordon,et al.  Factors Associated with Corneal Scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study , 2000, Cornea.

[9]  K. Zadnik,et al.  The relation between disease asymmetry and severity in keratoconus , 2003, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Gordon,et al.  Corneal Scarring and Vision in Keratoconus: A Baseline Report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study , 2000, Cornea.

[11]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  T T McMahon,et al.  Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  J. W. Warnicki,et al.  Corneal topography , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  W. M. Bourne,et al.  A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  T T McMahon,et al.  Standardized Rigid Contact Lens Fitting Protocol for Keratoconus , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  M. Gordon,et al.  Comparison of Flat and Steep Rigid Contact Lens Fitting Methods in Keratoconus , 2005, Optometry and Vision Science.

[17]  J. Krachmer,et al.  Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. , 1984, Survey of ophthalmology.

[18]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  K. Schechtman,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Curvature in Keratoconus , 2006, Cornea.

[20]  K. Zadnik,et al.  Between-Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus , 2002, Cornea.

[21]  M. Gordon,et al.  Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus. , 2006, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[22]  K. Zadnik,et al.  Repeatability of Refraction and Corrected Visual Acuity in Keratoconus , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  M. Gordon,et al.  Visual Acuity Repeatability in Keratoconus: Impact on Sample Size , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.