Acrylic removable appliances: comparative evaluation of different postpolymerization methods.

INTRODUCTION In orthodontics, the polymeric part of removable orthodontic appliances could be a hazard for patients because high residual monomer contents can lead to allergic reactions. In addition, water uptake, color stability, and mechanical properties are influenced by the degree of conversion. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of different postpolymerization methods on the properties of removable orthodontic appliance resins. METHODS A total of 300 rectangular specimens (5 postpolymerization groups: 20 per group) were manufactured of Orthocryl (n = 100, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany), Palapress (n = 100, Heraeus-Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany), and Pro Base Cold (n = 100, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The first 2 postpolymerization groups were postcured in a stove (10 minutes at 40 degrees C or 80 degrees C). The third resin group was postcured in a microwave at 600W for 5 minutes, and the fourth polymer group was postcured in a microwave at 600W for 10 minutes. Twenty conventionally cured samples (cold-curing under pressure: water bath 40 degrees C, 25 minutes, 2.2 bar) were the control group. Water sorption, fracture toughness, and Vickers hardness were measured. RESULTS Fracture toughness and Vickers hardness of the resins are slightly increased after curing. Heat as a secondary curing method decreases water uptake of resins used for removable orthodontic appliances. CONCLUSIONS Heat postpolymerization appears to improve the properties of removable orthodontic appliance resins.

[1]  J. Williams,et al.  European group on fracture: Kc and Gc methods for polymers , 1990 .

[2]  T. Kallus Evaluation of the toxicity of denture base polymers after subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  C. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of an elevated level of residual monomer on the whitening of a denture base and its physical properties. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  T. Eliades,et al.  Orthodontic Materials Scientific And Clinical Aspects , 2006 .

[5]  J. McCabe,et al.  Tissue sensitivity to acrylic resin. A method of measuring the residual monomer content and its clinical application , 1976, British Dental Journal.

[6]  D Roberts-Harry,et al.  Orthodontics. Part 5: Appliance choices , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[7]  T. Peltomäki,et al.  Fatigue resistance of removable orthodontic appliance reinforced with glass fibre weave. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Doǧan,et al.  The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water absorption. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  I. Carlos,et al.  Cytotoxicity of denture base resins: effect of water bath and microwave postpolymerization heat treatments. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  K. Jandt,et al.  The reinforcement of dentures. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Color changes in post-cure heat-treated resin composites. , 1991, American journal of dentistry.

[12]  Wendt Sl The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability. , 1987 .

[13]  C D Stephens,et al.  The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  M. Behr,et al.  Electron beam irradiation of dental composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  C. Vergani,et al.  Flexural strength of autopolymerizing denture reline resins with microwave postpolymerization treatment. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  C. Davidson,et al.  Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  H. Matsumura,et al.  Comparative evaluation of secondary heat treatment and a high intensity light source for the improvement of properties of prosthetic composites. , 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  G. Graser,et al.  Porosity of denture resin cured by microwave energy. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  A. Caputo,et al.  Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  S Richmond,et al.  The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[21]  J L Ferracane,et al.  Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.