Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) reveals DNA sequence copy number changes that are shared among the different cell subpopulations present in a tumor and may help to delineate the average progression pathways of breast cancer. Previous CGH studies of breast cancer have concentrated on selected subgroups of breast cancer. Here, 55 unselected primary breast carcinomas were analyzed using optimized quality‐controlled CGH procedures. Gains of 1q (67%) and 8q (49%) were the most frequent aberrations. Other recurrent gains were found at 33 chromosomal regions, with 16p, 5p12–14, 19q, 11q13–14, 17q12, 17q22–24, 19p, and 20q13 being most often (>18%) involved. Losses found in >18% of the tumors involved 8p, 16q, 13q, 17p, 9p, Xq, 6q, 11q, and 18q. The total number of aberrations per tumor was highest in poorly differentiated (P = 0.01) and in DNA aneuploid (P = 0.05) tumors. The high frequency of 1q gains and presence of +1q as the sole abnormality suggest that it is an early genetic event. In contrast, gains of 8q were most common in genetically and phenotypically advanced breast cancers. The vast majority of breast cancers (80%) have gains of 1q, 8q, or both, and 3 changes (+1q, +8q, or −13q) account for 91% of the tumors. In conclusion, CGH results indicate that certain chromosomal imbalances are very often selected for, sometimes in a preferential order, during the progression of breast cancer. Further studies of such common changes may form the basis for a molecular cytogenetic classification of breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21:177–184, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Zeillinger,et al.  Patterns of allele losses suggest the existence of five distinct regions of loh on chromosome 17 in breast cancer , 1994, International journal of cancer.

[2]  B. Johansson,et al.  Chromosome analysis of 97 primary breast carcinomas: Identification of eight karyotypic subgroups , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[3]  Jorma Isola,et al.  In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[4]  J. Eyfjörd,et al.  Cytogenetic studies of breast carcinomas: Different karyotypic profiles detected by direct harvesting and short‐term culture , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[5]  L. Liotta,et al.  Identical allelic loss on chromosome 11q13 in microdissected in situ and invasive human breast cancer. , 1995, Cancer research.

[6]  J Piper,et al.  Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors , 1994, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[7]  B. Dutrillaux,et al.  Identification of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer and their organization within homogeneously staining regions , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[8]  K. Buetow,et al.  A common region of deletion on chromosome 17q in both sporadic and familial epithelial ovarian tumors distal to BRCA1. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  P. Lichter,et al.  Primary mediastinal (thymic) B-cell lymphoma is characterized by gains of chromosomal material including 9p and amplification of the REL gene. , 1996, Blood.

[10]  H. Olsson,et al.  Correlation between karyotypic pattern and clinicopathologic features in 125 breast cancer cases , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[11]  P. Devilee,et al.  Somatic genetic changes in human breast cancer. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  K. Offit,et al.  REL proto-oncogene is frequently amplified in extranodal diffuse large cell lymphoma , 1996 .

[13]  D Rutovitz,et al.  Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. , 1995, Cytometry.

[14]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Improved technique for analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1994, Cytometry.

[15]  W. Kuo,et al.  Increased copy number at 20q13 in breast cancer: defining the critical region and exclusion of candidate genes. , 1994, Cancer research.

[16]  A. Jauch,et al.  Correlation of microscopic phenotype with genotype in a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded testicular germ cell tumor with universal DNA amplification, comparative genomic hybridization, and interphase cytogenetics. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[17]  I. Bièche,et al.  Genetic alterations in breast cancer , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[18]  R. Lidereau,et al.  Identification of three regions on chromosome 17q in primary human breast carcinomas which are frequently deleted. , 1993, Cancer research.

[19]  F. Waldman,et al.  Molecular cytometry of cancer. , 1996, Human pathology.

[20]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Independent amplification and frequent co-amplification of three nonsyntenic regions on the long arm of chromosome 20 in human breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[21]  J. Trent,et al.  Clonal chromosome abnormalities in human breast carcinomas I. Twenty‐eight cases with primary disease , 1993, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[22]  J. Trent,et al.  Clonal chromosome abnormalities in human breast carcinomas II. Thirty‐four cases with metastatic disease , 1993, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[23]  B. Dutrillaux,et al.  Characterization of chromosomal anomalies in human breast cancer. A comparison of 30 paradiploid cases with few chromosome changes. , 1990, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[24]  F. Mitelman,et al.  Catalog of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Hybrid selection of transcribed sequences from microdissected DNA: isolation of genes within amplified region at 20q11-q13.2 in breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[26]  A. Schäffer,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. , 1997, Cancer research.

[27]  A. Zetterberg,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas. , 1995, Cancer research.

[28]  J Piper,et al.  Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Hilsenbeck,et al.  Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[30]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. , 1997, Cytometry.

[31]  K. Franssila,et al.  DNA copy number changes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--comparative genomic hybridization study. , 1996, Blood.