Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies

On the basis of an experiment using event-related brain potentials (EPRs), we argue that a characterisation of language-related positivities as necessarily syntax-related is too restrictive. Our data show that, in verb-final German clauses, the processing of a verb which disconfirms the expectations with regard to the hierarchical thematic structure of a sentence (who is doing what to whom) gives rise to an early (200–600 ms) parietal positivity. Thus, positive ERP components elicited during language processing appear to be related to operations (most often revisions) applying to hierarchically structured linguistic information in general, rather than to syntactic structure in particular.

[1]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Cause and the structure of verbs , 1997 .

[2]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[3]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[4]  Beatrice Primus,et al.  Cases and thematic roles , 1999 .

[5]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[6]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Friederici Language Comprehension: A Biological Perspective , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  S. Frisch,et al.  The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing , 2001, Neuroreport.

[9]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[10]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Diagnosis and Reanalysis: Two Processing Aspects the Brain May Differentiate , 1998 .

[11]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[13]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[14]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Neurobiology of Language Comprehension , 1998 .

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.