Fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: current status and new horizons for pharmacological reperfusion, part 1.

No treatment has had more profound impact on the global management of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than fibrinolytic therapy. The ability to achieve rapid and effective coronary reperfusion pharmacologically with a systemic intravenous bolus or infusion has truly transformed our therapeutic approach. Since this subject was last reviewed in 1998 in the New Frontiers Section of Circulation , there have been 2 additional fibrinolytic agents released for clinical application and 1 other that has undergone major and extensive phase 2 and 3 investigation.1 Although streptokinase (SK), recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), and more recently reteplase (r-PA) are in general clinical use, there remains some dissatisfaction with their overall efficacy. This relates in part to the failure to achieve optimal tissue reperfusion in approximately one half of patients so treated, as well as persistent risks associated with systemic hemorrhagic effects, some of which complicate ancillary vascular interventional procedures in complicated patients. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage, affecting 5 to 10 of 1000 patients treated, remains a dreaded complication.2 In this review, we examine (1) the evolution of the development of fibrinolytics; (2) the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of available agents; (3) the need for ancillary therapy; (4) the clinical indications, benefits and risks; (5) the therapeutic alternatives to fibrinolysis; and (6) the future developments that are likely to affect the application of this therapy. Sherry,3 one of the pioneers of fibrinolysis, has provided an instructive historical overview of the earliest origins of thrombolytic therapy, beginning with the recognition of the “fibrinolytic” potential of β-hemolytic streptococci, followed by the demonstration of the capacity of SK to dissolve clotted blood and fibrinous exudates in a patient with a hemothorax. It took an additional 25 years for this discovery to culminate in the application of SK treatment in …

[1]  G. Stone Primary angioplasty versus “earlier” thrombolysis—time for a wake-up call , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Touboul,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Reiner,et al.  How long is too long? Association of time delay to successful reperfusion and ventricular function outcome in acute myocardial infarction: the case for thrombolytic therapy before planned angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, American heart journal.

[4]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of the time saved by prehospital initiation of reteplase for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of The Early Retavase-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ER-TIMI) 19 trial. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Califf,et al.  Predicting outcome after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction according to ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes: a substudy of the GUSTO-III trial. Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded coronary arteries. , 2002, American heart journal.

[6]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  Enoxaparin as Adjunctive Antithrombin Therapy for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of the ENTIRE-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 23 Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[7]  H. White,et al.  Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[8]  Assent investigators Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: current status and new horizons for pharmacological reperfusion, part 2. , 2001, Circulation.

[10]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Bolus fibrinolysis: risk, benefit, and opportunities. , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  J. Rumsfeld,et al.  Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy. , 2000, JAMA.

[12]  H. White Thrombolytic therapy in the elderly , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  InTIME-II Investigators,et al.  Intravenous NPA for the treatment of infarcting myocardium early; InTIME-II, a double-blind comparison of single-bolus lanoteplase vs accelerated alteplase for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[14]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Polyethylene Glycol–Derivatized Cysteine-Substitution Variants of Recombinant Staphylokinase for Single-Bolus Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  A. Skene,et al.  Survival Outcomes 1 Year After Reperfusion Therapy With Either Alteplase or Reteplase for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) III Trial , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  M. Simoons,et al.  Safety and efficacy of eptifibatide vs placebo in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction; a phase II dose escalation, randomized, double-blind study. , 2000, European heart journal.

[17]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Risk of intracranial haemorrhage with bolus versus infusion thrombolytic therapy: a meta-analysis , 2000, The Lancet.

[19]  H A Feldman,et al.  Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[20]  C M Gibson,et al.  Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.

[21]  E. Antman,et al.  High levels of platelet inhibition with abciximab despite heightened platelet activation and aggregation during thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results from TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) 14. , 2000, Circulation.

[22]  L. Morrison,et al.  Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. , 2000, JAMA.

[23]  N. Powe,et al.  Lack of benefit for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with myocardial infarction who are older than 75 years. , 2000, Circulation.

[24]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Collaborative angiographic patency trial of recombinant staphylokinase (CAPTORS). , 2000, American heart journal.

[25]  E. Topol,et al.  Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[26]  E. Antman,et al.  Abciximab improves both epicardial flow and myocardial reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Observations from the TIMI 14 trial. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  S. Greenhouse,et al.  A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty with a strategy of short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial , 1999 .

[28]  D. Freimark,et al.  The significance of persistent ST elevation versus early resolution of ST segment elevation after primary PTCA. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  C. Bode,et al.  Platelet function during and after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction with reteplase, alteplase, or streptokinase. , 1999, Circulation.

[30]  F. Neumann,et al.  Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on platelet-leukocyte interaction and surface expression of the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 in acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  J S Alpert,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction) , 1999, Circulation.

[32]  F. Werf Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[33]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[35]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is a major determinant of arterial thrombolysis resistance. , 1999, Circulation.

[36]  E. Antman,et al.  Abciximab facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators. , 1999, Circulation.

[37]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in the "real world": one-year results from a nationwide French survey. , 1999, Circulation.

[38]  C. Gibson,et al.  Primary Angioplasty Compared with Thrombolysis: New Issues in the Era of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition and Intracoronary Stenting , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Safety assessment of single-bolus administration of TNK tissue-plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-1 trial. The ASSENT-1 Investigators. , 1999, American heart journal.

[40]  J. Hirsh,et al.  New antithrombotic agents , 1999, The Lancet.

[41]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) as adjuvant treatment of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction--a pilot study: biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes (BIOMACS II). , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  E. Antman,et al.  Fatal cardiac rupture among patients treated with thrombolytic agents and adjunctive thrombin antagonists: observations from the Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction 9 Study. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  R. Giugliano,et al.  TNK-tissue plasminogen activator compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI 10B trial. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10B Investigators. , 1998, Circulation.

[44]  J. López-Sendón,et al.  Evaluation of a weight-adjusted single-bolus plasminogen activator in patients with myocardial infarction: a double-blind, randomized angiographic trial of lanoteplase versus alteplase. , 1998, Circulation.

[45]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Risk for Intracranial Hemorrhage after Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[46]  F. Werf A Comparison of Continuous Infusion of Alteplase with Double-Bolus Administration for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1998 .

[47]  E. Topol A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. , 1998, JAMA.

[49]  S. Usuda,et al.  YM866, a novel modified tissue-type plasminogen activator, affects left ventricular function and myocardial infarct development in dogs with coronary artery thrombi. , 1998, Japanese journal of pharmacology.

[50]  E. Topol,et al.  Effects of reteplase and alteplase on platelet aggregation and major receptor expression during the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction treatment. GUSTO-III Investigators. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  V. Fuster,et al.  Randomized comparison of direct thrombin inhibition versus heparin in conjunction with fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-IIb Trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  C. Davies,et al.  Failed coronary thrombolysis , 1998, The Lancet.

[53]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. , 1998, Circulation.

[54]  D. Collen Staphylokinase: a potent, uniquely fibrin-selective thrombolytic agent , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[55]  W. Fennell,et al.  Randomized, double-blind study comparing saruplase with streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the COMPASS Equivalence Trial. Comparison Trial of Saruplase and Streptokinase (COMASS) Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  E. Topol Toward a new frontier in myocardial reperfusion therapy: emerging platelet preeminence. , 1998, Circulation.

[57]  Anderson Jl Why does thrombolysis fail? Breaking through the reperfusion ceiling. , 1997 .

[58]  R. Dietz,et al.  Sixty-minute alteplase protocol: a new accelerated recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator regimen for thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  R. Collins,et al.  Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Hirulog Versus Heparin in Patients Receiving Streptokinase and Aspirin for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HERO) , 1997 .

[60]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Randomized coronary patency trial of double-bolus recombinant staphylokinase versus front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, American heart journal.

[61]  R. Califf,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Bleeding After Contemporary Thrombolytic Therapy for Myocardial Infarction , 1997 .

[62]  S. Hosoda,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Trial of a Single Bolus Injection of the Novel Modified t-PA E6010 in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Native t-PA , 1997 .

[63]  U. Rosenschein,et al.  Analysis of coronary ultrasound thrombolysis endpoints in acute myocardial infarction (ACUTE trial). Results of the feasibility phase. , 1997, Circulation.

[64]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Catheter-based ultrasound thrombolysis. , 1997, Circulation.

[65]  W. Klein,et al.  Comparison of saruplase and alteplase in acute myocardial infarction. SESAM Study Group. The Study in Europe with Saruplase and Alteplase in Myocardial Infarction. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[66]  T. Investigators,et al.  A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction , 1997 .

[67]  E. Braunwald,et al.  TNK-tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10A dose-ranging trial. , 1997, Circulation.

[68]  E. Raftery,et al.  The association between cardiac events and myocardial ischaemia following thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction and the impact of carvedilol. , 1996, European heart journal.

[69]  Eric Boersma,et al.  Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour , 1996, The Lancet.

[70]  W. Weaver,et al.  Randomized comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double-bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID II Investigators. , 1996, Circulation.

[71]  Y. Taniyama,et al.  Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[72]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  Test of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) for prehospital use. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[73]  L. Barrios,et al.  A randomized trial of recombinant staphylokinase versus alteplase for coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction. The STAR Trial Group. , 1995, Circulation.

[74]  R. Wilcox Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence: International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics , 1995 .

[75]  R. Wilcox,et al.  Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics , 1995, The Lancet.

[76]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  More rapid, complete, and stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction. RAPID Investigators. , 1995, Circulation.

[77]  B. Sobel Intracranial bleeding, fibrinolysis, and anticoagulation. Causal connections and clinical implications. , 1994, Circulation.

[78]  K. Wegscheider,et al.  Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  U. Tebbe,et al.  Dose finding with a novel recombinant plasminogen activator (BM 06.022) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the German Recombinant Plasminogen Activator Study. A study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[80]  C. Fry,et al.  Science of urinary incontinence Report of a Meeting of Physicians and Scientists, University College London , 1994, The Lancet.

[81]  R. Becker Thrombolytic retreatment with tissue plasminogen activator for threatened reinfarction and thrombotic coronary reocclusion , 1994, Clinical cardiology.

[82]  R. Califf,et al.  Individual risk assessment for intracranial haemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy , 1993, The Lancet.

[83]  Gusto Angiographic Investigators The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[84]  U. Tebbe,et al.  Open, noncontrolled dose-finding study with a novel recombinant plasminogen activator (BM 06.022) given as a double bolus in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[85]  B. Keyt,et al.  A Slow Clearing, Fibrin-Specific, PAI-1 Resistant Variant of t-PA (T103N, KHRR 296-299 AAAA) , 1993, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[86]  J. Heim,et al.  Thrombolytic and Haemorrhagic Effects of Bolus Doses of Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and a Hybrid Plasminogen Activator with Prolonged Plasma Half-Life (K2tu-PA: CGP 42935) , 1993, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[87]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Coronary Thrombolysis With Recombinant Staphylokinase in Patients With Evolving Myocardial Infarction , 1993, Circulation.

[88]  J. Heim,et al.  Thrombolytic Activity of Two Chimeric Recombinant Plasminogen Activators (FK2tu-PA and K2tu-PA) in Rabbits , 1992, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[89]  David Hunt,et al.  ISIS-3 - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF STREPTOKINASE VS TISSUE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR VS ANISTREPLASE AND OF ASPIRIN PLUS HEPARIN VS ASPIRIN ALONE AMONG 41,299 CASES OF SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION , 1992 .

[90]  R. Califf,et al.  Racial Differences in Responses to Thrombolytic Therapy With Recombinant Tissue‐Type Plasminogen Activator: Increased Fibrin(ogen)olysis in Blacks , 1991, Circulation.

[91]  H. Hod,et al.  Repeat infusion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with acute myocardial infarction and early recurrent myocardial ischemia. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[92]  H. White,et al.  Safety and efficacy of repeat thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, British heart journal.

[93]  B. Coller Platelets and thrombolytic therapy. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[94]  U. Tebbe,et al.  Improved thrombolysis with a modified dose regimen of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[95]  S. Sherry The origin of thrombolytic therapy. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[96]  C. White,et al.  INTENSE MICROVASCULAR CONSTRICTION AFTER ANGIOPLASTY OF ACUTE THROMBOTIC CORONARY ARTERIAL LESIONS , 1989, The Lancet.

[97]  Aims Trial Study Group EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS APSAC ON MORTALITY AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: PRELIMINARY REPORT OF A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL , 1988, The Lancet.

[98]  G. Barlow,et al.  Comparison of Plasminogen Activators , 1987, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[99]  Y. Ohtsuki,et al.  ISOLATION OF HTLV-I FROM CEREBROSPINAL FLUID OF A PATIENT WITH MYELOPATHY , 1986, The Lancet.

[100]  Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Soprawivenza nell'Inf Miocardico. EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYTIC TREATMENT IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 1986, The Lancet.

[101]  F. Sheehan,et al.  Intravenous urokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[102]  E. Plow,et al.  The presence and release of alpha 2-antiplasmin from human platelets. , 1981, Blood.

[103]  M S Golden,et al.  Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[104]  K. Karsch,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction: Intracoronary application of nitroglycerin and streptokinase , 1979, Clinical cardiology.

[105]  W. Tillett,et al.  THE FIBRINOLYTIC ACTIVITY OF HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCI , 1933, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[106]  J. Anderson,et al.  Why does thrombolysis fail? Breaking through the reperfusion ceiling. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[107]  F. Verheugt A comparison of continuous infusion of alteplase with double-bolus administration for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[108]  Johan Herlitz,et al.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994 .

[109]  Frans Van de Werf,et al.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[110]  S. Holmberg Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, British journal of hospital medicine.

[111]  R. Rudolph,et al.  Biochemical properties of the kringle 2 and protease domains are maintained in the refolded t-PA deletion variant BM 06.022. , 1992, Protein engineering.

[112]  A. Mazaev,et al.  [Intracoronary administration of fibrinolysin in acute myocardial infarct]. , 1976, Terapevticheskii arkhiv.

[113]  Chazov Ei,et al.  Intracoronary administration of fibrinolysin in acute myocardial infarct , 1976 .

[114]  A. Fletcher,et al.  The treatment of patients suffering from early myocardial infarction with massive and prolonged streptokinase therapy. , 1958, Transactions of the Association of American Physicians.