CAD/CAM surface templates as an alternative to the intermediate wafer in orthognathic surgery.

OBJECTIVE A new simple technique using a pair of surface templates fabricated by CAD/CAM technique as an alternative to the use of intermediate surgical wafer is presented. STUDY DESIGN A patient with transverse maxillary cant and maxillary midline deviation was scanned using computed tomography (CT) to create a 3D model of the maxillofacial bone. Eight virtual cylindrical markers were placed on the selected locations of maxilla. Subsequently, the locations of these cylinders were expressed as drill holes in the preosteotomy templates. The maxillary segment was separated and repositioned in the computer according to preoperative plans. Postosteotomy surface templates were then designed and resin templates were fabricated by a rapid prototyping machine. After investing and casting, metal templates were fabricated. At the beginning of operation, surgical fixation holes on the maxilla were drilled with the preosteotomy templates. Once maxillary osteotomy and segmentation were finished, screws were placed through the holes in the postosteotomy templates into the predrilled holes on the bone correspondingly, and maxillary segments were fixed with the titanium plates. RESULTS After the postosteotomy templates were positioned and fixed, the maxillary segment was placed to the desired position. Maxillary transverse cant and midline deviation were corrected as the preoperative plan and simulation. CONCLUSION The use of the surface templates before and after osteotomy as an alternative to intermediate wafer in orthognathic surgery can minimize labor and errors contained in the traditional way, reducing preoperative work as well as a reduction in operation time.

[1]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  T. Turvey,et al.  Simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible: surgical technique and results. , 1982, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  K. Moos,et al.  How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  Jan Rustemeyer,et al.  The accuracy of two-dimensional planning for routine orthognathic surgery. , 2010, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  Kyu-Gin Song,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of the three-dimensional virtual method and the conventional manual method for model surgery and intermediate wafer fabrication. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  J. Gil,et al.  Predictability of maxillary repositioning during bimaxillary surgery: accuracy of a new technique. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  Kevin Montgomery,et al.  A Web-Based, Integrated Simulation System for Craniofacial Surgical Planning , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  G. Swennen,et al.  The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  S. Baek,et al.  Virtual model surgery and wafer fabrication for orthognathic surgery. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  W. Bell,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton , 2006 .

[11]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  A new paradigm for complex midface reconstruction: a reversed approach. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  E Ellis,et al.  Bimaxillary surgery using an intermediate splint to position the maxilla. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  Uwe Eckelt,et al.  Comparison of the predicted surgical results following virtual planning with those actually achieved following bimaxillary operation of dysgnathia. , 2005, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery. , 2005, Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[15]  Beat Hammer,et al.  Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  S. Schendel,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging and computer simulation for office-based surgery. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  A. Hildreth,et al.  Surgical accuracy in Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  K. Kahnberg,et al.  Planning and control of vertical dimension in Le Fort I osteotomies. , 1990, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[19]  Raphael Olszewski Re: How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery? Sharifi A, Jones R, Ayoub A, Moos K, Walker F, Khambay B, McHugh S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1089-1093. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[20]  J W Ferguson,et al.  Control of vertical dimension during maxillary orthognathic surgery. A clinical trial comparing internal and external fixed reference points. , 1992, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.