Exploring the Cognitive Basis of Right-Hemisphere Pragmatic Language Disorders

Despite considerable interest in the linguistic dimensions of right-hemisphere (RH) pragmatic language disorders, the cognitive bases for these are rarely examined. This study investigated two alternative explanations. First, RH pragmatic language disorders may reflect failure of the RH to synthesise incoming and preexisting information, verbal and visuospatial. In this case language and visuospatial performance should covary. Alternatively such disorders may reflect damage to executive control of all cognitive processing secondary to frontal system failure. In this case language and executive function would be associated. Further, in the former case, subjects should be insensitive to the plausibility of information, whereas in the latter they would be fixated by the literal meaning of information and therefore highly sensitive to plausibility. Eighteen patients with RH damage were compared to 20 matched controls on a range of language and neuropsychological tasks. Pragmatic performance was generally correlated to RH (visuospatial) function, not to executive function. Nonetheless RH patients were found to have problems ignoring plausibility. Thus the specific RH hypothesis described needs to be reconsidered.

[1]  M. Piercy,et al.  Constructional apraxia associated with unilateral cerebral lesions-left and right sided cases compared. , 1960, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  P. Coppens Subpopulations in closed-head injury: preliminary results. , 1995, Brain injury.

[3]  R W Sperry,et al.  Reception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  R. Brookshire,et al.  Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners , 1984, Brain and Language.

[5]  J. Graham Beaumont,et al.  The Blackwell dictionary of neuropsychology , 1996 .

[6]  A. Ardila,et al.  Linguistic abilities in patients with prefrontal damage , 1987, Brain and Language.

[7]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[8]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[9]  H. Brownell,et al.  Discourse ability and brain damage : theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1990 .

[10]  H. Gardner,et al.  Discourse Comprehension by Right-Hemisphere Stroke Patients: Deficits of Prediction and Revision , 1990 .

[11]  J. D. Saddy,et al.  Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[12]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[13]  P. Sommers,et al.  Pragmatic language skills alter closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests , 1993 .

[14]  William Hirst,et al.  Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology , 1984, Brain and Language.

[15]  Hanna K. Ulatowska,et al.  Discourse Performance in Subjects with Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1988 .

[16]  S. McDonald Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[18]  J. Hodges Handbook of Neuropsychology. Volume 11. , 1998 .

[19]  Walter Huber,et al.  Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia , 1982, Brain and Language.

[20]  E. Schneiderman,et al.  A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage , 1988, Brain and Language.

[21]  M. Albert,et al.  Missile wounds of the brain: Freda Newcombe. Oxford University Press, London, 1969. 145 pp. 42s , 1970 .

[22]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury , 1997 .

[23]  N. Foldi,et al.  Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[24]  ChrisD . Frith The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia , 1992 .

[25]  A. J. North,et al.  Discourse Performance in Older Adults , 1986, International journal of aging & human development.

[26]  M. Barnes Neurobehavioural Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis , 1992 .

[27]  Donna B. Pincus,et al.  The Effects of Right-Hemisphere Brain Damage on Patients' Use of Terms of Personal Reference , 1997, Brain and Language.

[28]  Howard Gardner The shattered mind: The person after brain damage , 1975 .

[29]  A. J. North,et al.  Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia , 1981, Brain and Language.

[30]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[31]  Skye McDonald,et al.  Clinical Insights into Pragmatic Theory: Frontal Lobe Deficits and Sarcasm , 1996, Brain and Language.

[32]  Maurizio Tirassa,et al.  Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological Constraints on Formal Theories of Dialogue , 1997, Brain and Language.

[33]  Michael P. Cannito,et al.  Disruption of reference in aging , 1986, Brain and Language.

[34]  D. Levine,et al.  Impaired verbal reasoning and constructional apraxia in subjects with right hemisphere damage , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  H. Gardner,et al.  Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Language.

[36]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Frontal Lobes , 1986 .

[37]  S. Axelrod,et al.  Effects on rat rope-climbing of injection with blood plasma fractions from schizophrenics and normals. , 1970, Journal of psychiatric research.

[38]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  Verbal comprehension deficits after right hemisphere damage , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[39]  A. J. North,et al.  Production of procedural discourse in aphasia , 1983, Brain and Language.

[40]  S. McDonald,et al.  The 'dice' game: a new test of pragmatic language skills after closed-head injury. , 1995, Brain injury.

[41]  Skye McDonald,et al.  Viewing the brain sideways? Frontal versus right hemisphere explanations of non-aphasic language disorders , 1993 .

[42]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Production and Evaluation of Requests by Right Hemisphere Brain-Damaged Individuals , 1994, Brain and Language.

[43]  D. Lancker,et al.  Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  R. Love,et al.  Language performance on visual processing tasks in right hemisphere lesion cases , 1980, Brain and Language.

[45]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults , 1987, Brain and Language.

[46]  S. McDonald Pragmatic Language Skills after Closed Head Injury: Ability to Meet the Informational Needs of the Listener , 1993, Brain and Language.

[47]  H. Gardner,et al.  The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks , 1990, Brain and Language.

[48]  C. Mateer,et al.  Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of implicit attitude , 1985, Brain and Language.

[49]  An extraordinary form of confabulation , 1978, Neurology.

[50]  J. Nespoulous,et al.  Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers , 1986, Brain and Language.

[51]  E. Weinstein Linguistic aspects of amnesia and confabulation. , 1971, Journal of psychiatric research.

[52]  Yves Joanette,et al.  Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults , 1999 .

[53]  Connie A. Tompkins,et al.  Contextual mood priming following left and right hemisphere damage , 1987, Brain and Cognition.

[54]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[56]  M. Hough Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization , 1990, Brain and Language.

[57]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Frontal lobes and language , 1989, Brain and Language.

[58]  E. Miller,et al.  Verbal fluency as a function of a measure of verbal intelligence and in relation to different types of cerebral pathology. , 1984, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[59]  A. Rey,et al.  Translations of excerpts from Andre Rey"s Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy and P. A. Osterrieth"s The Complex Figure Copy Test.. , 1993 .

[60]  John H. Flavell,et al.  The development of role-taking and communication skills in children , 1968 .

[61]  C. Frith,et al.  Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating “theory of mind” in people with schizophrenia , 1995, Schizophrenia Research.

[62]  M. Bunge Cerebral correlates of conscious experience P. A. Buser & A. Rougeul-Buser (eds) North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978) xii + 364 pp., $47.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[63]  H. Brownell,et al.  The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[64]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Mental Rotation and the Right Hemisphere , 1997, Brain and Language.

[65]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function , 1974 .

[67]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[68]  S. Chapman,et al.  Narrative and Procedural Discourse in Aphasia , 1990 .

[69]  J. Mcfie Assessment of organic intellectual impairment , 1975 .

[70]  H. Gardner,et al.  Comprehension and appreciation of humorous material following brain damage. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[71]  S. McDonald,et al.  Requests That Overcome Listener Reluctance: Impairment Associated with Executive Dysfunction in Brain Injury , 1998, Brain and Language.

[72]  Donna B. Pincus,et al.  Distinguishing Lies from Jokes: Theory of Mind Deficits and Discourse Interpretation in Right Hemisphere Brain-Damaged Patients , 1998, Brain and Language.

[73]  A. Basili,et al.  Verbal expression of right cerebrovascular accident patients: Convergent and divergent language , 1987, Brain and Language.

[74]  Roger Wales,et al.  An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage , 1986, Brain and Language.

[75]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs , 1983, Cortex.