Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Tabár | C. D'Orsi | C. Vyborny | S. Feig | D. Kopans | K. O'Shaughnessy | E. Sickles | R. Castellino | S. Wood | L. J. Warren Burhenne | L. W. Burhenne | Stephen A. Feig | Susan A. Wood | D B Kopans | László Tabár | R. Castellino | László Tabár | D. Kopans | S. Feig
[1] F. Winsberg,et al. Detection of Radiographic Abnormalities in Mammograms by Means of Optical Scanning and Computer Analysis , 1967 .
[2] L. Skoog,et al. Non-palpable invasive breast carcinomas from the Stockholm screening project. , 1989, Acta oncologica.
[3] S. Wall,et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials , 1993, The Lancet.
[4] J. Hendriks,et al. Screening for breast cancer in nijmegen. report of 6 screening rounds, 1975–1986 , 1989, International journal of cancer.
[5] L. Tabár,et al. REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.
[6] C. Beam,et al. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. , 1996, Academic radiology.
[7] L. Fajardo,et al. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8] R. Warren,et al. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms , 1996, BMJ.
[9] M. Pamilo,et al. Double reading of mammography screening films--one radiologist or two? , 1993, Clinical radiology.
[10] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.
[11] L. J. Burhenne,et al. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[12] D. Ikeda,et al. Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[13] A. Leitch,et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[14] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[15] Hendrick Re. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards. , 1992 .
[16] E A Sickles,et al. Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[17] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.
[18] L. Tabár,et al. SURVIVAL IN BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSED BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING EXAMINATIONS , 1986, The Lancet.
[19] A. Miller,et al. Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian national breast screening study , 1990, Cancer.
[20] R. Bird,et al. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.
[21] M. Wallis,et al. Classifying interval cancers. , 1995, Clinical radiology.
[22] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[23] C J Vyborny,et al. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? , 1994, Radiology.
[24] A. Miller,et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[25] S Ciatto,et al. Independent Double Reading of Screening Mammograms , 1995, Journal of medical screening.
[26] A. Miller,et al. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[27] L. Skoog,et al. The general mammography screening program in Stockholm. Organisation and first-round results. , 1994, Acta oncologica.
[28] M L Giger,et al. Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images. , 1992, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.
[29] Roland Holland,et al. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.
[30] L. Tabár,et al. The Swedish two-county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results on mortality and tumor characteristics. , 1992, Pathologie-biologie.
[31] S. Feig,et al. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40‐49 years , 1997, Cancer.
[32] A. Mushlin,et al. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.
[33] S. Duffy,et al. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.
[34] L. Tabár,et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.
[35] R E Hendrick,et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[36] E. Thurfjell,et al. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.
[37] S Shapiro,et al. Screening: Assessment of current studies , 1994, Cancer.
[38] M. Giger,et al. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.