Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a common approach to evaluate thyroid nodules. It offers definitive diagnosis of a benign or malignant nodule in the majority of cases. However, 10–25% of nodules yield one of three indeterminate cytologic diagnoses, leading to suboptimal management of these patients. Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is a common indeterminate diagnosis, with the cancer risk ranging from 6% to 48%. This study assessed whether a multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay can offer significant improvement in diagnosis in AUS/FLUS nodules. Methods: From May 2014 to March 2015, 465 consecutive FNA samples with the cytologic diagnosis of AUS/FLUS underwent prospective molecular testing using the ThyroSeq v2.1 panel. The panel included 14 genes analyzed for point mutations and 42 types of gene fusions occurring in thyroid cancer. In addition, eight genes were assessed for expression in order to evaluate the cell composition of FNA samples. Ninety-eight (21%) of these nodules had definitive surgical (n = 96) or nonsurgical (n = 2) follow-up and were used to determine the assay performance. Results: Among 465 AUS/FLUS nodules, three were found to be composed of parathyroid cells and 462 of thyroid follicular cells. Of the latter, 31 (6.7%) were positive for mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were NRAS and HRAS, and overall point mutations in seven different genes and five types of gene fusions were identified in these nodules. Among 98 nodules with known outcome, histologic analysis revealed 22 (22.5%) cancers. ThyroSeq v2.1 was able to classify 20/22 cancers correctly, showing a sensitivity of 90.9% [confidence interval (CI) 78.8–100], specificity of 92.1% [CI 86.0–98.2], positive predictive value of 76.9% [CI 60.7–93.1], and negative predictive value of 97.2% [CI 78.8–100], with an overall accuracy of 91.8% [CI 86.4–97.3]. Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate that the ThyroSeq v2.1 multi-gene NGS panel of molecular markers provides both high sensitivity and high specificity for cancer detection in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, which should allow improved management for these patients.

[1]  S. Mandel,et al.  Role of repeat fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules , 2003, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[2]  R. Seethala,et al.  Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next‐generation sequencing assay , 2014, Cancer.

[3]  W. Kim,et al.  Surgical results of thyroid nodules according to a management guideline based on the BRAF(V600E) mutation status. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  M. Prasad,et al.  BRAF Mutation Testing of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens Enhances the Predictability of Malignancy in Thyroid Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance , 2011, Acta Cytologica.

[5]  G. Kennedy,et al.  American Thyroid Association Statement on Surgical Application of Molecular Profiling for Thyroid Nodules: Current Impact on Perioperative Decision Making , 2015 .

[6]  Juan Rosai,et al.  Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: A synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine‐Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference , 2008, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[7]  Min Jung Kim,et al.  Parathyroid incidentalomas detected on routine ultrasound-directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients referred for thyroid nodules and the role of parathyroid hormone analysis in the samples. , 2009, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[8]  D. Clark,et al.  Utilization of ancillary studies in thyroid fine needle aspirates: A synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference , 2008, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[9]  H. Gharib,et al.  Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: An Appraisal , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  R. Nayar,et al.  The indeterminate thyroid fine‐needle aspiration , 2009, Cancer.

[11]  K. Schoedel,et al.  Variability in the Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Sources and Recommendations , 2011, Acta Cytologica.

[12]  K. Robinson,et al.  Increases in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations, operations, and diagnoses of thyroid cancer in the United States. , 2013, Surgery.

[13]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Acta Cytologica.

[14]  Yuri E Nikiforov,et al.  RAS point mutations and PAX8-PPAR gamma rearrangement in thyroid tumors: evidence for distinct molecular pathways in thyroid follicular carcinoma. , 2003, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[15]  R. Seethala,et al.  Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[16]  E. Marqusee,et al.  Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated fna be the preferred initial approach? , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  Jack Yang,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations , 2007, Cancer.

[18]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma , 2014, Cell.

[19]  Darya Chudova,et al.  Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Amy Y. Chen,et al.  American Thyroid Association Statement on Surgical Application of Molecular Profiling for Thyroid Nodules: Current Impact on Perioperative Decision Making. , 2015, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[21]  M. Castro,et al.  An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[22]  E. Cibas,et al.  The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology , 2009, Springer International Publishing.

[23]  G. Chiappetta,et al.  Thyroid targeting of the N-ras(Gln61Lys) oncogene in transgenic mice results in follicular tumors that progress to poorly differentiated carcinomas , 2006, Oncogene.