Does It Matter Which Effort Task You Use? A Comparison of Four Effort Tasks When Agents Compete for a Prize

Effort tasks are commonly used to assess individual investment and performance in an experimental setting. Although the tasks used are diverse, they are typically intended to be equivalent as far as they aim to generalize beyond the specific task. We compare an induced value effort task and three real effort tasks in a contest game. Results show that there is no equivalence across tasks in relation to how risk attitude, anxiety and gender predict performance.

[1]  G. Charness.  Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[2]  Anders U. Poulsen,et al.  Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[3]  A. Sashegyi,et al.  Application of a generalized random effects regression model for cluster-correlated longitudinal data to a school-based smoking prevention trial. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Gender and competition at a young age , 2004 .

[5]  E. Keogh,et al.  Test anxiety, evaluative stress, and susceptibility to distraction from threat , 2001 .

[6]  I Haslock,et al.  Visual analogue scales. , 1982, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  S. Skaperdas,et al.  Risk Aversion in Contests , 1995 .

[8]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Tournaments and Office Politics: Evidence from a Real Effort Experiment , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Roman M. Sheremeta,et al.  A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments , 2012, Experimental Economics.

[11]  David L. Dickinson,et al.  The Carrot vs. the Stick in Work Team Motivation , 2001 .

[12]  Dorothea Kübler,et al.  Gender differences in team work and team competition , 2011 .

[13]  R. A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of anxiety sensitivity on emotional response to a stress task. , 1990, Behaviour research and therapy.

[14]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences , 2003 .

[15]  John Morgan,et al.  Endogenous entry in contests , 2012 .

[16]  David Huffman,et al.  Reference Points and Effort Provision , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory , 1992 .

[18]  E. C. Huskisson,et al.  Graphic representation of pain , 1976, Pain.

[19]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  Incentive Systems in a Real Effort Experiment , 1998, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  D. Ariely,et al.  Effort for Payment , 2004, Psychological science.

[21]  M. D. Pratt,et al.  An experimental investigation of efficient rent-seeking , 1989 .

[22]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort? The Complementarity between Agency and Crowding-Out Theories , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Incentives in a Multi-Task Principal-Agent Model , 2004 .

[24]  Uwe Sunde,et al.  Self-Confidence and Search , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Gabriele K. Lünser,et al.  On the Competition of Asymmetric Agents , 2008 .

[26]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[27]  Uri Gneezy,et al.  Does high wage lead to high profits? An experimental study of reciprocity using real effort , 2002 .

[28]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  Tournaments and Piece Rates: An Experimental Study , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[30]  Roman M. Sheremeta,et al.  Endowment Origin, Demographic Effects, and Individual Preferences in Contests , 2012 .

[31]  Bernd Irlenbusch,et al.  Fairness as a constraint on trust in reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experiment , 2000 .

[32]  A. Hillman,et al.  RISK-AVERSE RENT SEEKERS AND THE SOCIAL COST OF MONOPOLY POWER , 1984 .

[33]  Kathrin Pokorny.  Pay—but do not pay too much: An experimental study on the impact of incentives , 2008 .

[34]  Christine Harbring,et al.  An experimental study on tournament design , 2003 .

[35]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game , 2005 .

[36]  Matthew L. Spitzer,et al.  Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice , 1985, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[37]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  Asymmetric Tournaments, Equal Opportunity Laws, and Affirmative Action: Some Experimental Results , 1992 .

[38]  V. Crawford,et al.  Tiger Women: An All-Pay Auction Experiment on Gender Signaling of Desire to Win * , 2012 .

[39]  S. Gächter,et al.  Social Comparison and Performance: Experimental Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[41]  H. Weck-Hannemann,et al.  Taxation and the Veil of Ignorance – A Real Effort Experiment on the Laffer Curve , 2003 .

[42]  C. Puppe,et al.  Putting Reciprocity to Work - Positive Versus Negative Responses in the Field , 2006 .

[43]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Papers in Experimental Economics: Incentive Compatible Experimental Processes for the Provision of Public Goods , 1979 .

[44]  Jonathan H. W. Tan,et al.  Understanding perpetual R&D races , 2008 .

[45]  V. Smith,et al.  Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games , 1994 .

[46]  Muriel Niederle,et al.  Gender and Competition , 2011 .

[47]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  A. Gift,et al.  Visual Analogue Scales: Measurement of Subjective Phenomena , 1989, Nursing research.

[49]  E. Fehr,et al.  Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation , 1993 .

[50]  V. Smith.  Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[51]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions , 2000 .

[52]  Nicolas Treich,et al.  Risk-aversion and prudence in rent-seeking games , 2010 .

[53]  R. McNally,et al.  Experimental induction of anxious and depressed moods: Are Velten and musical procedures necessary? , 1991, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[54]  Heike Hennig-Schmidt,et al.  In search of worker's real effort reciprocity: A field and a laboratory experiment , 2010 .

[55]  Roman M. Sheremeta,et al.  Testing Canonical Tournament Theory: On the Impact of Risk, Social Preferences and Utility Structure , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[56]  Christine Harbring,et al.  Incentives in Tournaments with Endogenous Prize Selection , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[57]  N. Lowe,et al.  A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[58]  Gary Charness,et al.  How Robust is Laboratory Gift Exchange? , 2001 .

[59]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Real effort versus chosen effort in experiments , 2007 .

[60]  S. Gächter,et al.  Reputation and Reciprocity: Consequences for the Labour Relation , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[61]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[62]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Affirmative Action Policies Promote Women and Do Not Harm Efficiency in the Laboratory , 2012, Science.

[63]  Kai A. Konrad,et al.  Risk Aversion in Rent�?Seeking and Rent�?Augmenting Games , 1997 .

[64]  Armin Falk,et al.  Performance Pay and Multi-Dimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences and Gender , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[65]  A. Ichino,et al.  Clean Evidence on Peer Effects , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[66]  Romain Zeiliger,et al.  Redesigning Teams and Incentives in a Merger: An Experiment with Managers and Students , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[67]  C. Spielberger.  State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory , 2010 .

[68]  Ronald Bosman,et al.  Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-Take Experiment , 2002 .

[69]  Kenju Akai,et al.  Morals and Mores? Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality from the US and Japan , 2008 .

[70]  J. Brandts,et al.  Do Labour Market Conditions Affect Gift Exchange? Some Experimental Evidence , 2003 .

[71]  R. Cattell,et al.  The nature and measurement of anxiety. , 1963, Scientific American.

[72]  David Masclet,et al.  A Behavioral Laffer Curve: Emergence of a Social Norm of Fairness in a Real Effort Experiment , 2008 .

[73]  David Gill,et al.  Nuffield Centre for Experimental Social Sciences Discussion Paper Series a Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition a Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition , 2022 .

[74]  Graham Loomes,et al.  The impact of fairness on bargainin , 1994 .

[76]  M. D. Pratt,et al.  Risk aversion and rent-seeking: An extension and some experimental evidence , 1991 .

[77]  R. Sloof,et al.  Performance Measurement, Expectancy and Agency Theory: An Experimental Study , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[78]  W. Downie,et al.  The visual analogue scale in the assessment of grip strength. , 1978, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[79]  E. Fehr,et al.  Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: experimental evidence , 1997 .

[80]  E. Lezzi.  Agents' performance and emotions : an experimental investigation , 2014 .