Proposed Functional Architecture and Associated Benefits Analysis of a Common Ground Control Station for Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Abstract : The proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) and lack of mandated standards has led to unique Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and Ground Control Station (GCS) designs. A former Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, stated in an Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) that UAS GCS commonality could reduce manpower, procurement, sustainment and life cycle costs. While the ADM provided an impetus for commonality, it did not define a path. This project defines a common GCS functional architecture that provides the first steps on the path to UAS commonality. Stakeholder documentation was analyzed to identify areas of greatest concern and to examine previous efforts in this domain. Then, a tailored systems engineering process was employed to develop a new set of requirements which includes a common Air Vehicle Operator (AVO) Human-Machine Interface. These requirements enabled the creation of an innovative functional architecture for a common GCS concept. The utilization of this architecture has multiple operational, logistical, and financial benefits. This project quantified AVO training cost benefits and found that implementation of the common GCS architecture in accordance with the derived requirements will benefit the Department of Defense through reduced Operations and Support costs and increased operational capability.

[1]  M. Ephimia Morphew,et al.  Helmet-mounted displays for unmanned aerial vehicle control , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Reliability growth of repairable systems , 1980 .

[3]  Dennis M. Buede,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods , 1999 .

[4]  Gerald L. Crowder Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness Analysis Model Being Developed for the Component Improvement Programs of the Air Force and the Navy , 1992 .

[5]  Michael K. Raymer A Comparative Analysis of the Army MQ-8B Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV) and Navy MQ-8B Manpower & Training Requirements , 2009 .

[6]  Matthew C. Stracker An operational manpower analysis of the RQ-8 Fire Scout Vertical Take-Off Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV) , 2007 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Mixed Fleet Flying Between Two Commercial Aircraft Types: An Empirical Evaluation of the Role of Negative Transfer , 2005 .

[8]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[9]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[10]  N. Sundgren,et al.  Managerial issues in parts sharing among product development projects: a case study , 2002 .

[11]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Commonality in Military Equipment: A Framework to Improve Acquisition Decisions , 2009 .

[12]  Alexander Kossiakoff,et al.  Systems Engineering Principles and Practice , 2020 .

[13]  J. R. Imhof,et al.  Joint primary aircraft training system (JPATS) concept development: an application of systems engineering methodology , 1990, IEEE Conference on Aerospace and Electronics.

[14]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  Disiplin Para Pemimpin Pasar: Pilihan Pelanggan Anda, Persempit Fokus Anda, Kuasailah Pasar Anda = The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus, Dominate Your Market , 2002 .

[15]  Michael T Braman Privatization of Military Repair Depots , 2012 .

[16]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders-Choose your customers , 2015 .

[17]  Charles Thomas,et al.  Joint unmanned aerial vehicle family interoperability and commonality , 1990 .