Midterm outcomes of tricuspid valve repair versus replacement for organic tricuspid disease.

BACKGROUND Organic tricuspid valve (TV) disease is uncommon. Few studies have compared TV repair with replacement in these patients. The current study compared midterm outcomes of TV repair versus replacement in a large group of patients with organic tricuspid disease. METHODS Two-hundred and fifty patients underwent surgery for organic TV disease at our institution from 1979 to 2003. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were obtained, were 99% complete, and were 5.2 +/- 4.1 years long (mean +/- standard deviation). RESULTS One hundred and seventy-eight patients (71%) underwent TV repair and 72 (29%) received TV replacement (54 bioprosthetic, 18 mechanical). Repair patients were more likely to have hypertension, rheumatic pathology, or elective surgery. Concomitant procedures included mitral (50% of patients), aortic (26%), and coronary bypass (6%) operations. Perioperative and midterm mortality were higher in the replacement group (both p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed TV replacement as an independent predictor of midterm mortality (hazard ratio: 5.1, 95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 9.1, p < 0.001) and decreased event-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 3.6, p = 0.02). Follow-up echocardiography revealed more moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation in repair patients (38% vs 5%, p < 0.001), but no difference in New York Heart Association functional class or reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS Tricuspid valve repair is associated with better perioperative, midterm, and event-free survival than TV replacement in patients with organic tricuspid disease. Despite more tricuspid regurgitation in the repair group during follow-up, reoperation rates and functional class were similar. Repair should be performed whenever possible in patients with organic tricuspid disease.

[1]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1996, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  C. Guglielmi,et al.  Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  L. Cohn,et al.  Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  M. Ajuria,et al.  Carpentier's flexible ring versus De Vega's annuloplasty. A prospective randomized study. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  G. Primo,et al.  Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  I. Yada,et al.  Preoperative evaluation and surgical treatment for tricuspid regurgitation associated with acquired valvular heart disease. The Kay-Boyd method vs the Carpentier-Edwards ring method. , 1990, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Jeevanantham Rajeswaran,et al.  Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  M. Ionescu,et al.  Long-term results of DeVega tricuspid annuloplasty. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  L. Cohn Tricuspid Regurgitation Secondary to Mitral Valve Disease: When and How to Repair , 1994, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[10]  Jayant Nath,et al.  Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  L. L. Michaelis,et al.  Tricuspid regurgitation. A comparison of nonoperative management, tricuspid annuloplasty, and tricuspid valve replacement. , 1976, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  W. Stewart,et al.  Tricuspid valve surgery and intraoperative echocardiography: factors affecting survival, clinical outcome, and echocardiographic success. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Armstrong,et al.  Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  Y. Konishi,et al.  Comparative study of Kay-Boyd's, DeVega's and Carpentier's annuloplasty in the management of functional tricuspid regurgitation. , 1983, Japanese circulation journal.

[15]  C. Doré,et al.  Tricuspid valve replacement: UK Heart Valve Registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.