Retrospective interrupted time series examining hypertension and diabetes medicines usage following changes in patient cost sharing in the ‘Farmácia Popular’ programme in Brazil

Objectives ‘Farmácia Popular’ (FP) programme was launched in 2004, expanded in 2006 and changed the cost sharing for oral hypoglycaemic (OH) and antihypertensive (AH) medicines in 2009 and in 2011. This paper describes patterns of usage and continuity of coverage for OH and AH medicines following changes in patient cost sharing in the FP. Study design Interrupted time series study using retrospective administrative data. Methods Monthly programme participation (PP) and proportion of days covered (PDC) were the two outcome measures. The open cohort included all patients with two or more dispensings for a given study medicine in 2008–2012. The interventions were an increase in patient cost sharing in 2009 and zero patient cost sharing for key medicines in 2011. Results A total of 3.6 and 9.5 million patients receiving treatment for diabetes and hypertension, respectively, qualified for the study. Before the interventions, PP was growing by 7.3% per month; median PDC varied by medicine from 50% to 75%. After patient cost sharing increased in 2009, PP reduced by 56.5% and PDC decreased for most medicines (median 60.3%). After the 2011 free medicine programme, PP surged by 121 000 new dispensings per month and PDC increased for all covered medicines (80.7%). Conclusion Cost sharing was found to be a barrier to continuity of treatment in Brazil’s private sector FP programme. Making essential medicines free to patients appear to increase participation and continuity of treatment to clinically beneficial levels (PDC >80%).

[1]  Ufma Plano de ações estratégicas para o enfrentamento das doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Brasil , 2017 .

[2]  T. Rosemann,et al.  One-year adherence to oral antihyperglycemic medication and risk prediction of patient outcomes for adults with diabetes mellitus , 2016, Medicine.

[3]  L. Lopes,et al.  Access to medicines for diabetes treatment in Brazil: evaluation of “health has no price” program , 2016, Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.

[4]  T. Brennan,et al.  Predicting adherence trajectory using initial patterns of medication filling. , 2015, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  J. Steiner,et al.  Impact on glycated haemoglobin of a biological response‐based measure of medication adherence , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[6]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  D. Ross-Degnan,et al.  Farmácia Popular Program: changes in geographic accessibility of medicines during ten years of a medicine subsidy policy in Brazil , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice.

[8]  S. Barberato-Filho,et al.  Access to antihypertensive agents in Brazil: evaluation of the "health has no price" program. , 2014, Clinical therapeutics.

[9]  M. Nichol,et al.  Multiple Medication Adherence and its Effect on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Comorbid Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension , 2013, Medical care.

[10]  Cynthia Magluta Políticas e Sistema de Saúde no Brasil , 2013 .

[11]  Matthew Perri,et al.  Medication (Re)fill Adherence Measures Derived from Pharmacy Claims Data in Older Americans: A Review of the Literature , 2013, Drugs & Aging.

[12]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  S. Vinker,et al.  Addressing healthcare inequities in Israel by eliminating prescription drug copayments. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[14]  K. Athanasakis,et al.  Abolishing coinsurance for oral antihyperglycemic agents: effects on social insurance budgets. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  E. Miranda,et al.  Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program. , 2010, Revista de saude publica.

[16]  Nilson de Rosario Costa,et al.  Precios y disponibilidad de medicamentos en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil , 2010 .

[17]  W. Lynch,et al.  Effect of antihypertensive medication adherence among employees with hypertension. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[18]  K. Chan,et al.  Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases , 2006, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[19]  Marsha A Raebel,et al.  Measurement of Adherence in Pharmacy Administrative Databases: A Proposal for Standard Definitions and Preferred Measures , 2006, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[20]  J. Cramer A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[21]  M Christopher Roebuck,et al.  Medication adherence leads to lower health care use and costs despite increased drug spending. , 2011, Health affairs.

[22]  C. Asche,et al.  A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. , 2011, Clinical therapeutics.

[23]  B. D. Saúde. Plano de Ações Estratégicas para o Enfrentamento das Doenças Crônicas Não Transmissíveis (DCNT) , 2011 .

[24]  Albert Maydeu-Olivares,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Testing , 2010 .

[25]  K. Nair,et al.  Prescription copay reduction program for diabetic employees: impact on medication compliance and healthcare costs and utilization. , 2009, American health & drug benefits.

[26]  Brasil. Ministério da Ciência Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais - Rename , 2007 .

[27]  L. Kennedy Effect of Medication Nonadherence on Hospitalization and Mortality Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus , 2007 .

[28]  A V Prochazka,et al.  The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.