Mathematical model library for recombinant e.coli cultivation process

Biotechnological processes are among the most complicated control objects that require deep knowledge about the process. These systems have nonlinear relationships between process variables and properties that vary over time. Usually such processes are hard to model and require exceptional knowledge and experience in this field. In this review article studies conducted within the last five years in the biotechnology field, that used various model types (mechanistic models, neural networks, fuzzy models) to model cultivation processes were analyzed. Recommendations on what type of models should be used taking into account available process knowledge and experimental data were provided. Mechanistic models are best suited if there is a lack in experience in this field, advanced models like neural networks, fuzzy logic or hybrid models should be used if there is enough experimental data and process knowledge since these models tend to model the process more precisely and take in to account parameters or phenomena that cannot be described by mechanistic models. Keywords—biotechnological processes, neural networks, fuzzy logic, cell growth modeling.

[1]  Michel Perrier,et al.  Estimation of multiple specific growth rates in bioprocesses , 1990 .

[2]  Rui Oliveira,et al.  Hybrid modeling for quality by design and PAT-benefits and challenges of applications in biopharmaceutical industry. , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[3]  J. Romero,et al.  Double-stranded RNA production and the kinetics of recombinant Escherichia coli HT115 in fed-batch culture , 2018, Biotechnology reports.

[4]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics” , 2011 .

[5]  INTERCRITERIA ANALYSIS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ESCHERICHIA COLI FED-BATCH MATHEMATICAL MODEL , 2015 .

[6]  C. Grady,et al.  Effects of growth rate and influent substrate concentration on effluent quality from chemostats containing bacteria in pure and mixed culture , 1972, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  G. Najafpour,et al.  Fermentative Lactic Acid Production by Lactobacilli: Moser and Gompertz Kinetic Models , 2017 .

[8]  Katharina Nöh,et al.  Current state and challenges for dynamic metabolic modeling. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[9]  M. Gozan,et al.  Kinetic study of Escherichia coli BPPTCC-EgRK2 to produce recombinant cellulase for ethanol production from oil palm empty fruit bunch , 2018 .

[10]  M. Fenice,et al.  Kinetic modeling of Shewanella baltica KB30 growth on different substrates through respirometry , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.

[11]  R. Dondo,et al.  Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering MODELING THE MICROBIAL GROWTH OF TWO Escherichia coli STRAINS IN A MULTI-SUBSTRATE ENVIRONMENT , 2014 .

[12]  Rimvydas Simutis,et al.  Hybrid process models for process optimisation, monitoring and control , 2004, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[13]  Monika Heiner,et al.  Fuzzy Stochastic Petri Nets for Modeling Biological Systems with Uncertain Kinetic Parameters , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  Christian Napoli,et al.  A mathematical model for file fragment diffusion and a neural predictor to manage priority queues over BitTorrent , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[16]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  The potential of random forest and neural networks for biomass and recombinant protein modeling in Escherichia coli fed‐batch fermentations , 2015, Biotechnology journal.

[17]  Isidro F. Aguillo Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.