Effect of unconditioned stimulus magnitude on the emergence of conditioned responding.

Although unconditioned stimulus (US) magnitude influences conditioning, no experiment has addressed whether it influences a decision point at which the organism first responds (Gallistel & Gibbon, 2000). Two appetitive conditioning experiments with rats confirmed that the rate of food cup entries and proportion of head jerking were related to the number of pellets (US) provided after the conditioned stimulus. In addition, the onset of responding measured by the number of reinforcers to a criterion or by a quantitatively identified change point also reflected US magnitude. Two aversive conditioning experiments also found that the amount and onset of freezing were related to footshock intensity. All experiments identified a trial at which responding increased abruptly in individual subjects. However, the point where the increase occurred was earlier with larger USs.

[1]  P. Durlach.  Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  M. Bouton,et al.  Memory priming and trial spacing effects in Pavlovian learning , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[3]  N. Mackintosh.  A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[4]  R. Rescorla.  Learning about qualitatively different outcomes during a blocking procedure , 1999 .

[5]  R. Bolles,et al.  Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines , 1980 .

[6]  K. Lattal,et al.  Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Rescorla.  Signaling intertrial shocks attenuates their negative effect on conditioned suppression , 1984 .

[9]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing , 1980, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.

[10]  P. Holland.  Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats , 2000 .

[11]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[12]  Kimberly S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Independent effects of stimulus and cycle duration in conditioning: The role of timing processes , 2000 .

[13]  W. Hays.  Statistics for psychologists , 1963 .

[14]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. , 1967, Psychological review.

[15]  R. Rescorla.  Informational Variables in Pavlovian Conditioning , 1972 .

[16]  L. Kamin,et al.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[17]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[18]  P. Durlach.  Explicitly unpaired procedure as a response elimination technique in autoshaping. , 1986 .

[19]  R. N. Leaton,et al.  Potentiated Startle: Its Relation to Freezing and Shock Intensity in Rats , 1985 .

[20]  B. Skinner.  Farewell, My LOVELY!1 , 1976 .

[21]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Carrive.  Conditioned fear to environmental context: cardiovascular and behavioral components in the rat , 2000, Brain Research.

[23]  P. Holland.  The effects of qualitative and quantitative variation in the US on individual components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned behavior in rats , 1979 .

[24]  B. Spruijt,et al.  On the relationship between anticipatory behaviour in a Pavlovian paradigm and Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in rats (Rattus norvegicus) , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  Stephen Maren,et al.  The Amygdala Is Essential for the Development of Neuronal Plasticity in the Medial Geniculate Nucleus during Auditory Fear Conditioning in Rats , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Pape,et al.  Generalisation of conditioned fear and its behavioural expression in mice , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  T. Robbins,et al.  Different types of fear-conditioned behaviour mediated by separate nuclei within amygdala , 1997, Nature.

[28]  H. Terrace,et al.  Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping. , 1977 .

[29]  M. Bouton,et al.  Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  Mark E. Bouton,et al.  Context effects on conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement in an appetitive conditioning preparation , 1989 .

[31]  P. Holland.  Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms , 1983 .

[33]  M. Fanselow.  The postshock activity burst , 1982 .

[34]  H. Terrace,et al.  Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory , 1980 .

[35]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Different lateral amygdala outputs mediate reactions and actions elicited by a fear-arousing stimulus , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  H. Terrace,et al.  Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons , 1980 .

[37]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[38]  P. Balsam,et al.  Intertrial interval and unconditioned stimulus durations in autoshaping , 1979 .

[39]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.