The Impact of Comparison Processes on Coactors' Frustration and Willingness to Expend Effort

Subjects worked on an identical simple motor task that was described as being either rhigh or low in value. They worked alone or with a coactor whose performance rate was slightly superior or very superior to their own. When they performed with a very superior coactor on a high-value task, subjects were more frustrated and produced an inferior level of performance relative to those working with the same coactor on a low-value task. When subjects performed alone, however, they were not more frustrated while working on a high-than low-value task. Nevertheless, their performance scores reflected differences in motivation-subjects working on a high-value task tended to perform better than those working on a low-value task. These data are discussed within a social comparison framework and a resource investment analysis of goal value. The implications of this analysis for self-evaluation maintenance and modeling are discussed.

[1]  Payment and value: The generation of an evaluation standard and its effect on value , 1987 .

[2]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[3]  R. Baumeister.  Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Linda Silka,et al.  Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence ☆ , 1983 .

[5]  J. J. Seta,et al.  The impact of comparison processes on coactors' task performance. , 1982 .

[6]  J. J. Seta,et al.  The Impact of Personal Equity Processes on Performance in a Group Setting , 1983 .

[7]  S. M. Berger.  Observer Perseverance as Related to a Model's Success: A Social Comparison Analysis. , 1971 .

[8]  A. Baumgardner,et al.  Strategic failure in social interaction: Evidence for expectancy disconfirmation processes. , 1987 .

[9]  John H. Mueller.  The Effects of Individual Differences in Test Anxiety and Type of Orienting Task on Levels of Organization in Free Recall. , 1978 .

[10]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[11]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Group Influence on Individual Task Performance , 1983 .

[12]  A. Tesser,et al.  Some Affective Consequences of Social Comparison and Reflection Processes: The Pain and Pleasure of Being Close , 1988 .

[13]  The vicarious partial reinforcement effect: An empirical and theoretical analysis , 1975 .

[14]  J. J. Seta,et al.  The Effects of Evaluation on Organizational Processing , 1988 .

[15]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D. Robbins.  Partial reinforcement: A selective review of the alleyway literature since 1960. , 1971 .

[17]  D. Hebb.  Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[18]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[19]  A. Tesser.  11 – Self-Evaluation Maintenance Processes: Implications for Relationships and for Development* , 1984 .

[20]  G. S. Sanders,et al.  Distraction as a Source of Drive in Social Facilitation Research , 1978 .