The effects of cyclic loading on pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.

STUDY DESIGN The pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation after cyclic loading was tested using young human cadaveric specimens. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of fatigue loading on the pull-out strength of medial and lateral unicortical and bicortical sacral screws and to correlate the pull-out strength with sacral bone density and the screw insertion torque. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The immediate biomechanical effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation have been studied in aged cadaveric specimens. The effect of cyclic loading on the pull-out strength of sacral screw fixation is unknown, however, and data from young specimens is rare. METHODS Eleven fresh specimens of human sacrum were used in this study. Bone mineral density at the vertebral body and the ala were determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Seven-millimeter compact Cotrel-Dubousset sacral screws were inserted into the sacrum anteromedially and anterolaterally, both unicortically and bicortically, and the insertion torque for each screw was measured. Cyclic loading from 40 to 400 N was applied to each screw at a frequency of 2 Hz up to 20,000 cycles. Pull-out tests were conducted after completion of the fatigue tests. RESULTS The average bone density was 0.38 +/- 0.08 g/mL at the S1 body and 0.24 +/- 0.05 g/mL at the S1 ala. The insertion torque and average pull-out force after cyclic loading were significantly higher for bicortical fixation than for unicortical fixation for a particular screw alignment. The pull-out strength and insertion torque of medially oriented fixation was always higher than that for lateral fixation, however, regardless of whether the insertion was unicortical or bicortical. The pull-out force of unicortical and bicortical medial screw fixations after cyclic loading showed significant linear correlations with both the insertion torque and the bone mineral density of the S1 body. CONCLUSIONS In a young population, screw orientation (anterolateral or anteromedial) was more important in determining pull-out strength than screw depth (unicortical or bicortical) after fatigue loading, anteromedially directed screws being significantly stronger than laterallyplaced screws. Bone mineral density of the S1 body andinsertion torque were good preoperative and intraoperative indicators of screw pull-out strength.

[1]  M. Pope,et al.  Correlation of bone equivalent mineral density to pull-out resistance of triangulated pedicle screw construct. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[2]  B. Myers,et al.  The Role of Imaging and In Situ Biomechanical Testing in Assessing Pedicle Screw Pull‐Out Strength , 1996, Spine.

[3]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic considerations for dorsal sacral plate-screw fixation. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Morphometric Evaluation of the First Sacral Vertebra and the Projection of Its Pedicle on the Posterior Aspect of the Sacrum , 1995, Spine.

[5]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[6]  D N Kunz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength: Correlation with Insertional Torque , 1993, Spine.

[7]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Static and Cyclical Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Spinal Constructs , 1993, Spine.

[8]  S. Garfin,et al.  The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  S. Garfin,et al.  Screw Fixation in the Human Sacrum: An In Vitro Study of the Biomechanics of Fixation , 1992, Spine.

[10]  D. E. Swartz,et al.  A Biomechanical Study of the Fatigue Characteristics of Thoracolumbar Fixation Implants in a Calf Spine Model , 1992, Spine.

[11]  T. Tamaki,et al.  Mechanical Stability of the Pedicle Screw Fixation Systems for the Lumbar Spine , 1992, Spine.

[12]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Surgical treatment of neuropathic spinal arthropathy. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[13]  W. Rauschning,et al.  Surgical Anatomy of the Sacrum: A Guide for Rational Screw Fixation , 1991, Spine.

[14]  J. Massie,et al.  Anatomic Consideration for Sacral Screw Placement , 1991, Spine.

[15]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Treatment of adult spinal deformity with fusion to the sacrum using CD instrumentation. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[16]  W. Edwards,et al.  In vitro spinal arthrodesis implant mechanical testing protocols. , 1989, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  J. Corin,et al.  MECHANICAL TESTING OF SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  M. Pope,et al.  Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. , 1988, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  B. T. Field,et al.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  N. Langrana,et al.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. , 1984, Spine.