Exploring landscapes of quantum technology with Patent Network Analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Newman,et al. Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[2] Cyprien Delpech de Saint Guilhem,et al. Post-Quantum Cryptography: Current state and quantum mitigation , 2021 .
[3] F. Geels. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.
[4] Cristina C. Amitrano,et al. On Technology in Innovation Systems and Innovation-Ecosystem Perspectives: A Cross-Linking Analysis , 2018, Sustainability.
[5] Feihu Xu,et al. Quantum information research in China , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.
[6] M. Plenio,et al. Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource , 2016, 1609.02439.
[7] Mike Wright,et al. Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems , 2014 .
[8] Weitao Yang,et al. Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Adaptive Neural Networks. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[9] Ludo Waltman,et al. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.
[10] Ian A. Walmsley,et al. UK national quantum technology programme , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.
[11] G. Dosi. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .
[12] P. Nykänen,et al. Implementation and Evaluation of E-Health Ecosystems in Two-Sided Markets , 2017 .
[13] Ian Sommerville,et al. Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering , 2011, Interact. Comput..
[14] V. Bulović,et al. Colloidal quantum dot light-emitting devices , 2010, Nano reviews.
[15] F. Geels. Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930)—a case study in multi-level perspective , 2005 .
[16] C. Blanquart,et al. THE INVENTOR'S PERSPECTIVE ON CONDITIONS FOR RADICAL INNOVATIONS IN FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION: CASE STUDIES FROM FRANCE AND GERMANY , 2018 .
[17] Florian Kern,et al. The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions , 2019, Research Policy.
[18] Michael G. Raymer,et al. The U.S. National Quantum Initiative: From Act to action , 2019, Science.
[19] de Nooy Wouter,et al. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software. Third edition. , 2018 .
[20] O. Granstrand,et al. Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition , 2020, Technovation.
[21] Susan Albers Mohrman,et al. Reflections: Sociotechnical Systems Design and Organization Change , 2018, Journal of Change Management.
[22] Roy Rada,et al. Interacting WITH Computers , 1989, Interact. Comput..
[23] anonymous. Waiting for the Quantum Simulation Revolution , 2019, Physics.
[24] Rob Thew,et al. The European quantum technologies flagship programme , 2017 .
[25] Steven P. Reinhardt,et al. Practical Annealing-Based Quantum Computing , 2019, Computer.
[26] A. Cillessen,et al. Bully Victimization: Selection and Influence Within Adolescent Friendship Networks and Cliques , 2015, Journal of youth and adolescence.
[27] Ksenia S. Podoynitsyna,et al. A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[28] W. Ashton. Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems , 2008 .
[29] M. Lewenstein,et al. Quantum Entanglement , 2020, Quantum Mechanics.
[30] Harry Buhrman,et al. The European Quantum Technologies Roadmap , 2017, 1712.03773.
[31] Lars Jaeger,et al. The Second Quantum Revolution: From Entanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super-Technologies , 2019 .
[32] Chih-Hung Hsieh,et al. Development trajectory and research themes of foresight , 2016 .
[33] F. Geels. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .
[34] E. Schrödinger. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 1935, Naturwissenschaften.
[35] Giuseppe Soda,et al. Instrumental and Affective Ties within the Lab: The Impact of Informal Cliques on Innovative Productivity , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[36] Travagnin Martino,et al. Patent analysis of selected quantum technologies , 2019 .
[37] K. Blind,et al. Publishing, patenting, and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists , 2018, Research Policy.
[38] Bart Verspagen,et al. Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..
[39] Thierry Paul,et al. Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.
[40] D. DiVincenzo,et al. Quantum computation with quantum dots , 1997, cond-mat/9701055.
[41] Gábor Csárdi,et al. The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .
[42] Jürgen Mlynek. The European quantum flagship: First results and future perspectives , 2021 .
[43] D. R. White,et al. Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .
[44] Elizabeth Gibney,et al. Chinese satellite is one giant step for the quantum internet , 2016, Nature.
[45] Jochen Markard,et al. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .
[46] Ray A. Perlner,et al. Status report on the second round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process , 2020 .