Channel Interaction in Cochlear Implant Users Evaluated Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential

One likely determinant of performance with a cochlear implant is the degree of interaction that occurs when overlapping subsets of nerve fibers are stimulated by various electrodes of a multielectrode array. The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) can be used to assess physiological channel interaction. This paper describes results from two different methods of analysis of ECAP channel interaction measures made by the Nucleus neural response telemetry system. Using a forward-masking stimulus paradigm, masker and probe pulses are delivered through different electrodes. The response to the probe is then dependent on the extent of overlap in the stimulated neural populations. The amplitude of response to the probe as a function of masker electrode position then reflects the degree of overlap between the population of neurons responding to the masker and those stimulated by the probe. Results demonstrate large variations across individual implant users as well as across electrodes within an individual. In general, the degree of interaction is shown to be dependent on stimulus level.

[1]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[2]  B. Moore,et al.  The Use of Psychophysical Tuning Curves to Explore Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Carolyn J Brown,et al.  Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation , 1988, Hearing Research.

[4]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[5]  R P Michelson Multichannel cochlear implants. , 1978, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[6]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Comparison of EAP Thresholds with MAP Levels in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant: Data from Children , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[7]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Kevin H. Franck,et al.  The electrically evoked whole-nerve action potential: fitting applications for cochlear implant users , 1999 .

[9]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[10]  J K Shallop,et al.  Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Q J Fu,et al.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  B. Wilson,et al.  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[14]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A method for evaluating the selectivity of electrodes implanted for nerve simulation , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  P J Abbas,et al.  The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.