Human Gait State Prediction Using Cellular Automata and Classification Using ELM

In this research article, we have reported periodic cellular automata rules for different gait state prediction and classification of the gait data using Extreme Machine Leaning (ELM). This research is the first attempt to use cellular automaton to understand the complexity of bipedal walk. Due to nonlinearity, varying configurations throughout the gait cycle and the passive joint located at the unilateral foot-ground contact in bipedal walk resulting variation of dynamic descriptions and control laws from phase to phase for human gait is making difficult to predict the bipedal walk states. We have designed the cellular automata rules which will predict the next gait state of bipedal steps based on the previous two neighbor states. We have designed cellular automata rules for normal walk. The state prediction will help to correctly design the bipedal walk. The normal walk depends on next two states and has total eight states. We have considered the current and previous states to predict next state. So we have formulated 16 rules using cellular automata, eight rules for each leg. The priority order maintained using the fact that if right leg in swing phase then left leg will be in stance phase. To validate the model we have classified the gait Data using ELM (Huang et al. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, vol 2. IEEE, 2004, [1]) and achieved accuracy 60%. We have explored the trajectories and compares with another gait trajectories. Finally we have presented the error analysis for different joints.

[1]  Shiv Ram Dubey,et al.  Human Activity Recognition Using Gait Pattern , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Vis. Image Process..

[2]  Hongming Zhou,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[3]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Biometric gait identification based on a multilayer perceptron , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Silhouette Analysis-Based Gait Recognition for Human Identification , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Bidirectional association of joint angle trajectories for humanoid locomotion: the restricted Boltzmann machine approach , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[6]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Less computationally intensive fuzzy logic (type-1)-based controller for humanoid push recovery , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Robust and accurate feature selection for humanoid push recovery and classification: deep learning approach , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[8]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Design of Vector Field for Different Subphases of Gait and Regeneration of Gait Pattern , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[9]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Study of humanoid Push recovery based on experiments , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Embedded Systems (CARE).

[10]  Vijay Bhaskar Semwal Data Driven Computational Model for Bipedal Walking and Push Recovery , 2017, ArXiv.

[11]  Vijay Bhaskar Semwal,et al.  An optimized feature selection technique based on incremental feature analysis for bio-metric gait data classification , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[12]  Chen Wang,et al.  Human Identification Using Temporal Information Preserving Gait Template , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Aaron D. Ames,et al.  A Human-Inspired Hybrid Control Approach to Bipedal Robotic Walking , 2011 .

[14]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Modeling bipedal locomotion trajectories using hybrid automata , 2016, 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON).

[15]  Yunhong Wang,et al.  A Survey of Advances in Biometric Gait Recognition , 2011, CCBR.

[16]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Generation of Joint Trajectories Using Hybrid Automate-Based Model: A Rocking Block-Based Approach , 2016, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[17]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Universal Approximation using Incremental Constructive Feedforward Networks with Random Hidden Nodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[18]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Multiobjective optimized bipedal locomotion , 2019, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[19]  G. C. Nandi,et al.  Biped model based on human Gait pattern parameters for sagittal plane movement , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Embedded Systems (CARE).

[20]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[21]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Toward Developing a Computational Model for Bipedal Push Recovery–A Brief , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[22]  Jürgen Kosel,et al.  Wearable Flexible Sensors: A Review , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[23]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Biologically-inspired push recovery capable bipedal locomotion modeling through hybrid automata , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Gora Chand Nandi,et al.  Hybrid Model for Passive Locomotion Control of a Biped Humanoid: The Artificial Neural Network Approach , 2018, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[25]  Anubha Parashar,et al.  Push Recovery for Humanoid Robot in Dynamic Environment and Classifying the Data Using K-Mean , 2016, Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Monitoring: A Review , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.