Optimal Economic Design and Operation of Single‐ and Multi‐column Chromatographic Processes

Single‐column chromatography is widely used in the biopharmaceutical industries, although multi‐column alternatives in the form of simulated moving bed (SMB) processes are now emerging. It may be difficult, however, to determine which column alternative will be best suited for a given application, and this work sets out to address this issue. A systematic approach is presented that is based on a full economic appraisal of each process alternative based on an optimization of the net annual profit. Single‐column processes with and without recycling are considered, as are both the SMB and the Varicol process. The cyclic steady state for the SMB and Varicol processes is determined directly by complete discretization. The approach is applied to a case study based on a linear isotherm where it is found that for this particular system, a recycling policy is not necessary for the single column. When comparing the single‐column process with the multi‐column alternatives, the single column is the most economical provided the life time of the project is short; however, the economic benefits of the more capital‐intensive multi‐column processes are greater if the life time of the project is over 5 years. The SMB process is found to perform marginally better than the Varicol process over 15 years; however, this may be because not all extra degrees of freedom for the Varicol process were considered.

[1]  Henner Schmidt-Traub,et al.  Optimal design of batch and simulated moving bed chromatographic separation processes. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Modeling of separations by closed-loop steady-state recycling chromatography of a racemic pharmaceutical intermediate. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Larry Miller,et al.  Resolution of a racemic pharmaceutical intermediate. A comparison of preparative HPLC, steady state recycling, and simulated moving bed. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  A. K. Ray,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of SMB and varicol process for chiral separation , 2002 .

[5]  Klaus D. Timmerhaus,et al.  Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , 1958 .

[6]  C M Grill,et al.  Closed-loop recycling with periodic intra-profile injection: a new binary preparative chromatographic technique. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Jochen Strube,et al.  Dynamic simulation of simulated moving-bed chromatographic processes for the optimization of chiral separations , 1997 .

[8]  Anita M. Katti,et al.  Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography , 1994 .

[9]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Theoretical study of recycling in preparative chromatography , 1993 .

[10]  Larry Miller,et al.  Separation of a racemic pharmaceutical intermediate using closed-loop steady state recycling , 1998 .

[11]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  Experimental verification and optimisation of a detailed dynamic high performance liquid chromatographic column model , 2000 .

[12]  Ernst Dieter Gilles,et al.  A new concept for operating simulated moving-bed processes , 1999 .

[13]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of simulated moving bed and Varicol processes using a genetic algorithm. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  J. Strube,et al.  Dynamic simulation of simulated-moving-bed chromatographic processes , 1998 .

[15]  G. Dünnebier,et al.  Computationally efficient dynamic modelling and simulation of simulated moving bed chromatographic processes with linear isotherms , 1998 .

[16]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  Experimental verification and optimisation of a detailed dynamic high performance liquid chromatography column model , 2001 .

[17]  Georges Guiochon,et al.  Optimizing Experimental Conditions in Overloaded Gradient Elution Chromatography , 1996 .

[18]  Kevin F. Loughlin,et al.  Modelling of simulated moving bed adsorption system: a more precise approach , 1995 .

[19]  Eva Sorensen,et al.  A systematic approach for modeling chromatographic processes—Application to protein purification , 2008 .

[20]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Robust design of binary countercurrent adsorption separation processes , 1993 .

[21]  O Ludemann-Hombourger,et al.  Application of the "VARICOL" process to the separation of the isomers of the SB-553261 racemate. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND MODELLING OF CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING IN PREPARATIVE CHROMATOGRAPHY , 1995 .

[23]  S. Nilchan,et al.  On the Optimisation of Periodic Adsorption Processes , 1998 .

[24]  Achim Kienle,et al.  Simulated moving bed process with cyclic modulation of the feed concentration. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  Olivier Dapremont,et al.  Batch and simulated moving bed chromatographic resolution of a pharmaceutical racemate. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Preparative liquid chromatography , 1987, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Comparison of possible arrangements of five identical columns in preparative chromatography. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of a Simulated Moving Bed for the Separation of p-Xylene , 2002 .

[29]  Georges Guiochon,et al.  Optimizing preparative separations at high recovery yield , 1996 .

[30]  Michel Bailly,et al.  Preparative scale enantioseparation of a chiral epoxide: Comparison of liquid chromatography and simulated moving bed adsorption technology , 1993 .

[31]  Tingyue Gu,et al.  Mathematical modeling and scale-up of size-exclusion chromatography , 1998 .

[32]  Gail Sofer,et al.  Handbook of Process Chromatography: A Guide to Optimization, Scale Up, and Validation , 1997 .

[33]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Experimental assessment of powerfeed chromatography , 2004 .