Surveying activity-travel behavior in Flanders: Assessing the impact of the survey design

Ever since car ownership and car use started to increase in Western Europe and the USA, transportation planners attempted to model people’s travel behavior. In the context of the Feathers project a dynamic activity-based travel demand framework is developed for Flanders. In this paper, the complete survey design of the data collection effort required for such dynamic activity-based model is discussed. A mixed survey design of using a PDA application on the one hand, and using traditional paper and pencil diaries on the other hand, turns out to be a very suitable way of collecting detailed information about planned and executed activity-travel behavior of households. The results show that no attrition effects are present, not on the number of out-of-home activities reported, nor on the number of trips reported. Moreover the survey mode (PDA versus paper and pencil) has no direct impact on the quantities investigated. Notwithstanding, it is essential for further analysis on the Feathers data to explicitly take into account mode effects because of two reasons. First, the effect of explanatory variables can be influenced by the survey mode. Second, the variance in the estimation of the quantity investigated can differ significantly. Heteroscedatisc linear regression models provide the required framework to explicitly take into account these mode effects.

[1]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Survey Mode Integration and Data Fusion: Methods and Challenges , 2009 .

[2]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  ALBATROSS: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions , 2000 .

[3]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  TIME IN ECONOMIC THEORY , 1980 .

[4]  Chris Caplice,et al.  DAILY VARIATION OF TRIP CHAINING, SCHEDULING, AND PATH SELECTION BEHAVIOR OF WORK COMMUTERS , 1991 .

[5]  G. Wets,et al.  Tackling non response in household travel surveys: a case study , 2007 .

[6]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Activity-Travel Scheduling and Rescheduling Decision Processes: Empirical Estimation of Aurora Model , 2004 .

[7]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[8]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Nonresponse in household travel surveys , 1997 .

[9]  S. Demarest,et al.  Playing hard to get: field substitutions in health surveys , 2007, International Journal of Public Health.

[10]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Modelling Short-Term Dynamics in Activity-Travel Patterns: Conceptual Framework of the Feathers Model , 2007 .

[11]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Simulating emergent behavior and evolution of activity-travel patterns: data collection challenges , 2008 .

[12]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Field Evaluation of Personal Digital Assistant Enabled by Global Positioning System , 2008 .

[13]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition , 1963 .

[14]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Field Substitution and Unit Nonresponse , 1999 .

[15]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior , 1986 .

[16]  N Kalfs,et al.  NEW DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN TRAVEL SURVEYS. , 1997 .

[17]  J. Wolf.  Applications of New Technologies in Travel Surveys , 2006 .

[18]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Dynamic Activity-Travel Diary Data Collection Using a GPS-Enabled Personal Digital Assistant , 2006 .

[19]  T. Arentze,et al.  Modeling Individuals’ Activity-Travel Rescheduling Heuristics: Theory and Numerical Experiments , 2002 .

[20]  D. Dillman.  The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[21]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Modeling Effects of Anticipated Time Pressure on Execution of Activity Programs , 2001 .

[22]  M. Dix,et al.  Error and uncertainty in travel surveys , 1981 .

[23]  Hans Waege,et al.  Een samenleving onderzocht : methoden van sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek , 2001 .

[24]  P R Stopher,et al.  Use of an activity-based diary to collect household travel data , 1992 .